Cheech

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Cheech

Re: Cheech

by Will Bozarth » Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:09 pm

thank you for your response! in that case, I'll consider it authentic until someone can prove it a forgery.

{thumb2}

Re: Cheech

by nolanryan32 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:06 pm

Well seeing that I spoke to someone that has close ties to him through email - we carried on a good 6 reply back & forth email with each other, I would have to say it is authentic.

I don't see why someone through email would go through all the trouble to waste both mine & their time if they were just going to send out a forgery, ya know?

That & the fact that the picture I sent was sent along with one they included and the sigs match.


Also looking at known authentics online, they all to me match as well.


So my opinion - which is far from expert - is that it is indeed an authentic TTM success.

Cheech

by Will Bozarth » Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:48 am

So, I posted my Cheech "success" yesterday in Feedback, but I was wondering if he sends out authentics. I compared my signature to another signature that was received a short time before I received mine because... well... they looked the same.

I ruled out preprint by drawing a line from the end of the "C" upwards to the necklace:
Image

I ruled out autopen:
Image

Here's a supposed in-person signature from 2001:
Image

Opinions, please?

Top