Michelle Wie, Real or not?

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Michelle Wie, Real or not?

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?

by autographfanno1 » Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:45 am

jasonw wrote:Hi there :)

I have compared your autograph to a rush and complete version of Michelle's autograph:

Image

The autograph you have should be authentic.

Jason 8)
Jason - with that comparison you think it's authentic? The bit where it goes down in the TTM looks almost triangular whereas in the authentic it's curved. The start is just plain wrong too - in the authentics it NEVER loops round. The end looks nothing like authentics either - the others loop round whereas that does a sharp turn then a downwards curve. Add to that the autograph is broken towards the end and all the evidence points to it being a sec.

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?

by tyredsox » Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:32 pm

It reflects by itself, the things seem separate, so I think it is authentic.

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?

by devilson9991 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 6:25 pm

Now that you say it, the Michelle Wie that you received looks different from the preprint I received a little while ago from Omega Watches. :oops:
Mine looks EXACTLY like this:
http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/5855 ... ie1km7.jpg

Just check to see if it's a preprint or not:
Hold the photo up near eye level at an angle towards a source of light and look at the signature. If the signature appears to be "under" the gloss, or if the signature disappears altogether, that's a strong indication that it is preprinted into the photo. A hand-written signature will appear "on top" of the gloss and will not disappear when held at an angle towards light.

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?

by tyredsox » Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:33 pm

That guy says its real, and you can tell as well.

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?

by devilson9991 » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:42 pm

The Michelle Wie autograph is a preprint, Omega watches sends out PPs.

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?

by jasonw » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:05 pm

No problem ;-)

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?

by tyredsox » Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:54 pm

YES! OMG you do not know hot happy you made me. Thank you so much!

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?

by jasonw » Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:01 am

Hi there :)

I have compared your autograph to a rush and complete version of Michelle's autograph:

Image

The autograph you have should be authentic.

Jason 8)

Michelle Wie, Real or not?

by tyredsox » Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:12 pm

I go this and I am not sure if it is real or not. I got it through Omega Watches, but anyways, here is the picture. Please help me out!:
Thanks.
Image

Top