by lizane » Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:59 pm
I agree with Mr Kennedy - recent autographs simply seems too forced and traced, not flowing like the authentic example posted by Andy.

And as Mr Kennedy said, with some (most, actually) people's signatures, there's this part which is always the same (in Margaret's case, the little "t") and they will not suddenly make it different. It is quite easy to spot, because when it's different (even just a little), you will immediately notice it because you already know to look out for that specific part.
So, in short, I agree that it's secretarial.
Good luck,
zanne
I agree with Mr Kennedy - recent autographs simply seems too forced and traced, not flowing like the authentic example posted by Andy. {up} And as Mr Kennedy said, with some (most, actually) people's signatures, there's this part which is always the same (in Margaret's case, the little "t") and they will not suddenly make it different. It is quite easy to spot, because when it's different (even just a little), you will immediately notice it because you already know to look out for that specific part.
So, in short, I agree that it's secretarial. :(
Good luck,
zanne