Clint Eastwood's autographs

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Clint Eastwood's autographs

Re: Clint Eastwood's autographs

by dansautos » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:00 am

tinki wrote:
ryco11756 wrote: sorry but i have to disagree with you ..sec are fake autograph that someone foreged clint's signature.... a pp is a copy of the real signature. which is much better
Hmm, maybe.. Sec are very similar to orginal autographs, and they are often personalised. If somebody doesn't know which is orginal, and which is sec (it's quite hard to distinguish), u can be very proud of that what u have got. But in fact similar isn't same as orginal, so I think u are quite right...
This is just my opinion, but having a "forged" autograph that is good enough to "trick" people who don't know better isn't something I'd be particularly proud of; definitely not proud of more than having some other kind of inauthentic autograph. I'd rather have a celeb who's honest about not having the time to sign and just send preprints and not try to pretend to sign everything sent to them.

Re: Clint Eastwood's autographs

by tinki » Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:05 pm

ryco11756 wrote: sorry but i have to disagree with you ..sec are fake autograph that someone foreged clint's signature.... a pp is a copy of the real signature. which is much better
Hmm, maybe.. Sec are very similar to orginal autographs, and they are often personalised. If somebody doesn't know which is orginal, and which is sec (it's quite hard to distinguish), u can be very proud of that what u have got. But in fact similar isn't same as orginal, so I think u are quite right...

Re: Clint Eastwood's autographs

by guilder1st » Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:27 pm

ryco11756 wrote:
guilder1st wrote:He has been sending out secretarials for a very long time now.
we do not know 100% if it a sec. but it could be real or not? nobody is 100% real
Actually I do know this 100% for sure. I know this from various people that work with him at his wb studio office. Also there has been many comparisons and discussions about this in the past few years by many dealers and autograph experts on various forums and websites. They all come to the same conclusion.
But you are of course entitled to believe w/e you want to believe.

Re: Clint Eastwood's autographs

by ryco11756 » Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:22 pm

tinki wrote:Huh, I think secretarials are better than PP, but eaven if he's not giving orginals, I'll write him a letter.. :)

sorry but i have to disagree with you ..sec are fake autograph that someone foreged clint's signature.... a pp is a copy of the real signature. which is much better

Re: Clint Eastwood's autographs

by tinki » Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:18 pm

Huh, I think secretarials are better than PP, but eaven if he's not giving orginals, I'll write him a letter.. :)

Re: Clint Eastwood's autographs

by ryco11756 » Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:39 pm

guilder1st wrote:He has been sending out secretarials for a very long time now.
we do not know 100% if it a sec. but it could be real or not? nobody is 100% real

Re: Clint Eastwood's autographs

by guilder1st » Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:32 pm

He has been sending out secretarials for a very long time now.

Clint Eastwood's autographs

by tinki » Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:28 pm

Hi, so, is he sending back orginal or secretarial autographs? I'm just curious, maybe u will know the answer...

Top