Cheers, i was a bit worried.

autographfanno1 - I don't agree with you. The general shape of the two autograph matches well. Also, each and every signature has it's own features and just because Theo's Hiddink has a wider first section and a smoother curve does not make it fake. Futhermore, the authentic sample is signed around five years ago so Hiddink's signature could have very well changed by a bit. Lastly, Chelsea has terrible secs-; if it were a fake then it wouldn't be a hassle to spot out.

Therefore, my opinion of this autograph being authentic has not changed.

Jason

jasonw wrote:Here you go Theo



Jason

I'm sorry but those comparisons make it seem fake. The first section is far too wide, and the lines are too flat and long. The curve around is also too smoth. Jason, when you post comparisons like that which make it fake why do you think it's authentic?

Here you go Theo



Jason

yes please {thumb2}

Theo2008 wrote:Cheers Jason, can i just ask how you know?

Compared it with authentic samples. If you would like to see the comparision please tell me

Jason

Cheers Jason, can i just ask how you know?

Yes it is authentic.
Jason

yes i am pretty sure it looks authentic! =D
ps nice autograph

It took only 12 days

Does it look authentic compared to IP's?