Frank Sinatra

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Frank Sinatra

Re: Frank Sinatra

by tansk1 » Mon Mar 21, 2011 1:51 am

Here.. read this blog and tell me JSA isn't completely unprofessional. The company is a joke. The same can be said for PSA. And how can you say that an authenticator that sells their own autographs doesn't have a major conflict of interest?

http://sigartsinc.blogspot.com/2011/02/ ... ation.html

Re: Frank Sinatra

by rushbabies » Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:55 pm

If I were going to get something authenticated it would be by PSA or JSA. You probably work for some other authenticator and wanto to bad mouth JSA and PSA. PSA and JSA are very reliable and reputable dealers.

Re: Frank Sinatra

by autograph hound » Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:37 am

"I would NEVER recommend having an autograph authenticated by GAI, JSA, PSA or any other third party authentication company. They are all corrupt. Everyone who works at these places are corrupt. It is a waste of money!"

Amen :neutral:

Re: Frank Sinatra

by wlperie » Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:34 am

NickButler wrote:If it is real, I would say 60's.

We've thought of sending it to get check for authenticity, but it's so pricey for Sinatra.

I would NEVER recommend having an autograph authenticated by GAI, JSA, PSA or any other third party authentication company. They are all corrupt. Everyone who works at these places are corrupt. It is a waste of money!

I encourage everyone to read www.autographalert.com , when you get to the stie, click enter. Read the blog. Most of the posts expose the corruption with these companies.

Re: Frank Sinatra

by NickButler » Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:55 pm

Thank you for your input. It's always good to have someone to disagree with you, because a lot of the times you'll see things you didn't notice before.

Re: Frank Sinatra

by Doc Holiday » Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:51 pm

I'm not angry nor am I arguing. This is my last post on this subject. Like I said earlier enjoy your autograph.

Re: Frank Sinatra

by NickButler » Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:45 pm

I'm kinda confused at why you're getting so angry.

I asked a question, you had your opinion, I disagreed. I haven't had it checked for official authenticity and I have no documents on it and I haven't even claimed it to be real. I've made it clear I don't know, and yet you continue to argue.

Re: Frank Sinatra

by Doc Holiday » Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:38 pm

I wasn't discrediting ebay. I use it myself but like you said discredit the buyer or buyers. Only reason the lowlife sellers are on there is to sell to the unknowledgable buyers. Buyer educates himself, seller can't sell. Wasn't it P.T. Barnum who said "there is a sucker born every minute"? Same applies to ebay buyers.

Re: Frank Sinatra

by Will Bozarth » Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:26 pm

Doc Holiday wrote:I hope you don't purchase vintage autographs on ebay.
Hey now, don't discredit ebay. Discredit buyers and sellers. I've purchased authentics of Vincent Price, Boris Karloff, Rod Serling, and Peter Lorre. I agree 100% that the majority of what's on there is fraudulent, but with proper eyes, things are available.

Re: Frank Sinatra

by Doc Holiday » Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:19 pm

I know exactly who you are talking about. Dealt with him before and I'll email your pic to him along with this copy of our discussion and see what he says. Should be interesting.

Top