by wellthought » Fri Jul 17, 2009 5:38 pm
x-Jen-x wrote:To me it looks fake, but I'm not 100%...
Jen

Thanks for your response. Please forgive me, but I was trying to get as unbiased an opinion as I could since I have begun to question PSA/DNA after reading some negativity about them around here and elsewhere on the net. Just for the record, I have found about an equal number of "opinions" about
PSA/DNAbeing bad/good, so who knows what to believe???
Now, take another look and tell me if you still think it's fake.
Below is a known real Michael Jackson autograph from "autographworld's" website.

[quote="x-Jen-x"]To me it looks fake, but I'm not 100%...
Jen :)[/quote]
Thanks for your response. Please forgive me, but I was trying to get as unbiased an opinion as I could since I have begun to question PSA/DNA after reading some negativity about them around here and elsewhere on the net. Just for the record, I have found about an equal number of "opinions" about [b]PSA/DNA[/b]being bad/good, so who knows what to believe???
Now, take another look and tell me if you still think it's fake.
[img]http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s65/wellthought/MichaelJacksonPic.jpg[/img]
Below is a known real Michael Jackson autograph from "autographworld's" website.
[img]http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s65/wellthought/MichaelJacksonPic2.jpg[/img]