[quote="mufcdd"]I believe them to be authentic. I made a huge thread on her TTMs being secretarial a while back, in particular those black and white pics, but the sigs you have are vastly different from the usual b&w pic sigs.They actually look fine unlike the usual really poor looking broken down sigs she sends.[/quote]

I agree that it is different from her usual secretarial, but it looks like another secretarial to me. The second K in her IP's for many years now looks pretty much the same as her first K. This one just looks kind of weird and unlike her signature to me.

I believe them to be authentic. I made a huge thread on her TTMs being secretarial a while back, in particular those black and white pics, but the sigs you have are vastly different from the usual b&w pic sigs.They actually look fine unlike the usual really poor looking broken down sigs she sends.

I have read she resigns photos i have recieved the same autograph.I believe it to be real.

I sent a charity headed LOR plus an SAE on 13/08/2009 and received 2 4x6ish signed photos on 08/10/2009 one for myself and one for my charity [url=http://www.wamcare.org]WAMCARE[/url]

Obviously they are not preprints as they are different. But I know some people think they are secretarial so thoughts would be good! I have had one comment that they might be sec so would be really good to know. I cant put it up for auction without knowing.

[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v444/redtoffee/keiraknightley1edit.jpg[/img]

[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v444/redtoffee/keiraknightley2EWDIT.jpg[/img]

thank you for your help!

Laura
~X~