[quote="mufcdd"][quote="wlperie"] I would get the PSA DNA quick opinion for like 8 bucks.[/quote]

I wouldnt give PSA DNA a penny, they're useless.[/quote]
I also do not like third party authenticators. ALL of them make mistakes. Just read http://www.autographalert.com

But PSA DNA has done an excellent job at authenticating Michael Jackson signatures. I constantly see forgeries being passed by other companies.

They are the only third party authentication I would give money to.

[quote="wlperie"] I would get the PSA DNA quick opinion for like 8 bucks.[/quote]

I wouldnt give PSA DNA a penny, they're useless.

If the Michael Jackson autograph is a forgery, it is a pretty good one. If you do plan to bid, do not let the pictures or the PAAS authentication influence your decision. I would get the PSA DNA quick opinion for like 8 bucks.

Everyone is trying to make a buck on his autograph, and it is insane - This poor sucker who bid 405 dollars on this auction is a fool (IMO) - I think anyone who is good at forging sigs can do Michael's autograph.

yeah i think that autograph is fake also, i got him in-person 2 years ago and me and 1 other person was there. im telling you he really rushed on my photo, so no way he could make a neat signature like that with all of those people around him

[quote="paulmustang1"]Ya i think it is forged totally it's way to perfect to have been signed on the run.[/quote]

lol..i dnt think its THAT neat....i actually thought it was yucky lookin... :)

Ya i think it is forged totally it's way to perfect to have been signed on the run.

And Thats Dnt MEan Nothin Either....Jus Cuz There Are Ppl There Dnt Mean The Person CANT Get a CLean Autograph...I Think ITs Real.

Yeah, I agree. I don't see any photo's of Michael actually signing anything. And besides the autograph looks too "clean" considering it was in a large crowd with security around. There would have been some pushing and shoving.

[quote="musicfan"]well it has PHOTO PROOF..So.[/quote]

What photo proof? Those photos prove nothing.