doesnt look good to me,
i wouldnt trust it

My reply wasnt rude, YOURS was.

You asked for opinions, I gave one.

You asked how I knew, I told you.

Then you told me I was wrong.

So (for a 2nd time) I told you I was not wrong, and again showed you why its not legit.

How is that rude? Your comment of "uhhh no its not" was rude as it showed a total disregard for everything I said.

I replied with my own "uhhhh yes it is" because I knew you'd not taken on board what I'd said.

Why'd you buy it without knowing what you were buying though?

Ooh SORRY!

I did not buy from that seller, sorry for not looking around

I can't believe how rude your reply was!

xBethany. wrote:Uhh... no they aren't

Uhhh yes they are.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/125-MICHAEL-JACKS ... 0426359756

1) Its listed under pre-prints.

2) The listing itself states "THE SIGNATURE ON THIS MOUNT IS A REPRINT ( NOT AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE)"

3) The signatures all are identical, on account of them being printed.

So how exactly am I wrong?

The seller has tonnes of pre-prints, and I looked at quite a few, which were all PPs of fakes.

Uhh... no they aren't

xBethany. wrote:How can you tell?

Because the seller is selling numerous fakes.

They're actually all preprints as well, but preprints of fakes is even worse lol

How can you tell?

I have an opinion, the same as for most (if not all) Jackson "Is it real" questions on this site. Its fake, avoid.

Anyone?

Hi, what are your opinions on this?:

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2607djl&s=6