Kim Kardashian

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Kim Kardashian

Re: Kim Kardashian

by Jaffer » Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:26 pm

Michele--- wrote:Everytime I get a reply from a request I do try to do some research into if it is a true reply. I always thought that Kim's auto's from email/dash are "off"---even mine. Most posters here tend to disagree but IMO they are SEC. This to me looks authentic. Any issues I see with the dash/email success aren't there. Congrats! {up}
I would wager this is an early ttm from her in actual fact- it is the exact same thing I had, down to the ink colour. But I think her ttm have gone off a bit in recent times, but I think she sent out authentics at the start.

Re: Kim Kardashian

by Michele--- » Sun May 30, 2010 11:14 pm

Everytime I get a reply from a request I do try to do some research into if it is a true reply. I always thought that Kim's auto's from email/dash are "off"---even mine. Most posters here tend to disagree but IMO they are SEC. This to me looks authentic. Any issues I see with the dash/email success aren't there. Congrats! {up}

Re: Kim Kardashian

by bud simpson » Sun May 30, 2010 7:46 pm

Ditto. Looks like in person's I've gotten.

Re: Kim Kardashian

by Jaffer » Sun May 30, 2010 2:25 pm

Looks good to me

Re: Kim Kardashian

by crisabell » Sun May 30, 2010 3:26 am

Ok :)

!

by tyredsox » Sun May 30, 2010 3:19 am

Yay! Very excited! Thanks for the good news

Re: Kim Kardashian

by Ryco11757 » Sun May 30, 2010 2:15 am

crisabell wrote:It might be an autopen. There is a dot at the end {up} Not sure though :mrgreen:
I know the autograph looks much rushed than the ones recently that has been debated to be sec. i would have tosay authentic for that one and it does match the in-person more than the recent ones. BTW having a dot of the autograph dose not mean it a AP. i make a dot at the end of my signature also.

Re: Kim Kardashian

by crisabell » Sun May 30, 2010 1:58 am

It might be an autopen. There is a dot at the end {up} Not sure though :mrgreen:

Re: Kim Kardashian

by tyredsox » Sun May 30, 2010 1:49 am

Does anyone have an opinion? Please I'm in need of help!

Re: Kim Kardashian

by tyredsox » Sat May 29, 2010 10:12 pm

I have been looking, and here is a real auto:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Kim-Kardashian-Sign ... 562e5d05d7
It is similar to mine. This is a reprint of an auto (cheap bastards):
http://cgi.ebay.com/KIM-KARDASHIAN-PHOT ... 3effe506b5
Mine and the fake's autographs look different, and because he just copied and printed this picture, it was sent to another person. So I think it might be real, as they are similiar, BUT different on different parts such as the spot of the dot, the h, the K, all are a little different. But what do you think?

Top