by sponchild » Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:17 pm
Looks to me like a fairly good copy with some vital components missing and without the firmness of authority usually seen in his signatures. Some strokes appear to be going the wrong way, or are slightly the wrong shape but it is difficult to tell without seeing the actual photo. Possibly it was signed on a soft and moving surface, which might explain some of it. I will ask the person who will know for certain.
Looks to me like a fairly good copy with some vital components missing and without the firmness of authority usually seen in his signatures. Some strokes appear to be going the wrong way, or are slightly the wrong shape but it is difficult to tell without seeing the actual photo. Possibly it was signed on a soft and moving surface, which might explain some of it. I will ask the person who will know for certain.