I could of course be wrong, but authentication helps! Jack haleys is very close, s PO you nvr know!

Hello, for some reason both autographs do not look right to me. Jack Haley's looks very..."stiff". His original autograph "flowed". It was more of a flowing cursive. Not an expert on autographs, but I do know about ray bolger autographs. I collect them.myself. He usually wrote example: to alice, from the SCARECROW OF OZ,ray bolger.
The R and B does not look right to me.at all. VERY sloppy. He had much better handwriting.
If you dont mindme asking, how or where did you get these? Did you get them authenticated? I would! Im not an expert, but they make me nervous as they look.

they both look bad to me

It is worth the investment of having it professionally framed, they can explain which type of glass will offer the most protection. You probably know to keep it out of direct sunlight, but I would avoid any direct lighting.

Sorry to say but no. The red will fade fast. Also photos signed in other weird colors like green and purple fade as well. People DO NOT use these colors when you get the autographs. It may seem kind of neat to get the signatures in these colors but the truth is that they will fade. Stick with the blue, black, silver and gold pens.

is there any way to prevent fade? I have it surrounded.

Both are good and it's not a pre-print. However, just to let you know, that red sharpie fades after a time. It's a shame Haley had to sign with a red sharpie.

photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/52556435@N02/4844511362/
Jack Haley: http://www.flickr.com/photos/52556435@N02/4843893987/
Ray Bolger: http://www.flickr.com/photos/52556435@N02/4844511540/


thanks