by Dobbie » Mon Aug 23, 2010 2:22 pm
Brownie wrote:I'm going to say No. The reason I say this is not based on the quality of the autograph, but rather that I've seen that 'proof photo' before. Now I may of course be wrong, but if I saw a 'proof photo' one place and see it again popping up elsewhere, I would be hesitant to buy or trade from both sellers.
Thats the issue I have with this autograph, ironically it has nothing to do with the signature, but the photo provided. That photo has been taken from an angle that would suggest that the photographer is over the rails as to where the fans are requesting his autograph, I reckon that is a snapshot from a program of some sort. As for the photo, Brownie you are correct. I stumbled across this exact photograph myself about a year ago on an autograph website. The seller has the necessary paperwork showing that this was sold back in 2006 on Ebay for $11.99!. But when I search for the original power seller, nothing seems to come up.
[quote="Brownie"]I'm going to say No. The reason I say this is not based on the quality of the autograph, but rather that I've seen that 'proof photo' before. Now I may of course be wrong, but if I saw a 'proof photo' one place and see it again popping up elsewhere, I would be hesitant to buy or trade from both sellers.[/quote]
Thats the issue I have with this autograph, ironically it has nothing to do with the signature, but the photo provided. That photo has been taken from an angle that would suggest that the photographer is over the rails as to where the fans are requesting his autograph, I reckon that is a snapshot from a program of some sort. As for the photo, Brownie you are correct. I stumbled across this exact photograph myself about a year ago on an autograph website. The seller has the necessary paperwork showing that this was sold back in 2006 on Ebay for $11.99!. But when I search for the original power seller, nothing seems to come up.