Arnold S

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Arnold S

Re: Arnold S

by Hitman73 » Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:37 pm

Do you have a pic of the 1967 bb brochure signed by him? i wouldlove to see it. And yes you rarely see 60's Arnold signatures i have not seen one in years!!!.

I have a few>

Signed 1977 Rolling Stone magazine page signed in 1978

ImageImage

Arnold 1977 hardcover book signed in late 70's early 80's

ImageImage

Arnold 1978 Softcover book signed in late 70's early 80's

ImageImage

1986 Sports Illustrated signed in the 90's

ImageImage

These were signed in the 90's

ImageImageImageImageImageImage

Index Card signed in the 90's

Image

Re: Arnold S

by autograph hound » Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:39 pm

The oldest one I saw was from 1967 , a signed bb brochure.......you *never* see Arnolds from 60s on market.

Re: Arnold S

by Hitman73 » Sun Aug 14, 2011 11:16 pm

Someone tried to copy his sig but failed badly on the first one!.

You are correct i looked at their feedback and they seem to have legit stuff what i looked at. maybe the Arnold index was something that slipped by unfortunately.

The Arnold magazine looks good, the one in gold to Tom is good, Total Recall one is good, The Twins pic looks like it could be a very rushed signature same with Devito's sig.

Re: Arnold S

by Brownie » Sat Aug 13, 2011 11:36 pm

Hitman73 wrote:Having many Arnold's in my collection i would have to say a big NO on this one!. I also seen this on EvilBay and it is sloppy and not consistent with his graph. This looks like a forgery!!!!, nothing about it looks good?.

It's weird because that seller, Skylinesignatures, has some pretty big names and majority of the autographs look authentic. I agree though, the Arnold doesn't look right.

Re: Arnold S

by autograph hound » Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:27 pm

Re: Arnold S

by Hitman73 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 5:54 am

Having many Arnold's in my collection i would have to say a big NO on this one!. I also seen this on EvilBay and it is sloppy and not consistent with his graph. This looks like a forgery!!!!, nothing about it looks good?.

Arnold S

by autograph hound » Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:40 am


Top