by HappinessStan » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:47 pm
This one's real
http://theclinteastwoodarchive.blogspot ... mples.html
the d at the end of his surname is quite different to the 'secretarials' which are argued about here and elsewhere, if you look at google images the in person ones with credible stories attached have this d, as opposed to the supposed 'secretarials', all of which have a very angular and unbroken d at the end.
I know that other debates rage far and wide across these boards concerning isitreal, but there are some studies of his signature here
http://www.isitreal.com/index.php?optio ... d=99999999
According to them he has been using a secretary since 1985. I disagree with them on some things, they seem credible on others.
This one's real
http://theclinteastwoodarchive.blogspot.com/2009/05/autographs-true-examples.html
the d at the end of his surname is quite different to the 'secretarials' which are argued about here and elsewhere, if you look at google images the in person ones with credible stories attached have this d, as opposed to the supposed 'secretarials', all of which have a very angular and unbroken d at the end.
I know that other debates rage far and wide across these boards concerning isitreal, but there are some studies of his signature here
http://www.isitreal.com/index.php?option=com_mtree&task=viewlink&link_id=66&Itemid=99999999
According to them he has been using a secretary since 1985. I disagree with them on some things, they seem credible on others.