A quick question - via venues

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail] (new) [comet] [santa] [xmast-tree]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: A quick question - via venues

Re: A quick question - via venues

by bbgood39 » Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:31 pm

I'd definitely send to the one that appears to pass fanmail along and if you really want the person's autograph you could try the venue that's iffy too.

Re: A quick question - via venues

by packrat » Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:09 pm

If it were me, I'd just pick the one where I think I have the best chance and send there. There will always be another opportunity a year or two down the road.

A quick question - via venues

by KatrinaLouise » Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:03 pm

Hi

An artist I like is going on a really short tour and I would really like to write in order to try to get their autograph.

Anyway I was wondering what people's opinion is on sending to more than one venue. One venue appears to pass on fanmail, one I don't know about (i've e-mailed them) and one doesn't pass on (I twittered them). So I don't know whether to hedge my bets and try sending to the venue that appears to pass on as well as the one I have e-mail and not heard back from? and if I do this should I mention the other letter?

Thanks for any help

Top