Kiera Knightley FAIL

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Kiera Knightley FAIL

Re: Kiera Knightley FAIL

by osiris » Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:38 pm

Indeed. Most shots of Queen Amidala were actually Keira, as Padme used to constantly use decoys. Natalie was always dressed as a handmaiden.

Image

Re: Kiera Knightley FAIL

by Jaffer » Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:30 pm

tansternant wrote:
Jaffer wrote:
Rachel wrote:The "been around for 2 minutes" remark is stupid. Firstly, hardly. I'd probably call an actor who had done 1 or 2 films someone who has only been around for 2 minutes. I personally have been a fan of her work since Star Wars over ten years ago. She may not have been around as long as some, but she's been around for a lot longer than a lot of the popular actors today. I'm not defending her but remarks like that are ignorant and also irrelevant. She's either worthy of a wait or she isn't, if you lack respect for her because you THINK she hasn't been around long enough then why are you wasting your own time trying?
Was'nt it Natalie Portman in star wars?

And who was the actress standing next to her in a lot of her shots ? ;-)
Haha fair enough {up}

Re: Kiera Knightley FAIL

by tansternant » Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:23 pm

Jaffer wrote:
Rachel wrote:The "been around for 2 minutes" remark is stupid. Firstly, hardly. I'd probably call an actor who had done 1 or 2 films someone who has only been around for 2 minutes. I personally have been a fan of her work since Star Wars over ten years ago. She may not have been around as long as some, but she's been around for a lot longer than a lot of the popular actors today. I'm not defending her but remarks like that are ignorant and also irrelevant. She's either worthy of a wait or she isn't, if you lack respect for her because you THINK she hasn't been around long enough then why are you wasting your own time trying?
Was'nt it Natalie Portman in star wars?

And who was the actress standing next to her in a lot of her shots ? ;-)

Re: Kiera Knightley FAIL

by Jaffer » Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:53 pm

Rachel wrote:The "been around for 2 minutes" remark is stupid. Firstly, hardly. I'd probably call an actor who had done 1 or 2 films someone who has only been around for 2 minutes. I personally have been a fan of her work since Star Wars over ten years ago. She may not have been around as long as some, but she's been around for a lot longer than a lot of the popular actors today. I'm not defending her but remarks like that are ignorant and also irrelevant. She's either worthy of a wait or she isn't, if you lack respect for her because you THINK she hasn't been around long enough then why are you wasting your own time trying?
Was'nt it Natalie Portman in star wars?

Re: Kiera Knightley FAIL

by Heyheyyou » Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:53 pm

He still has a right to complain if he wants. Leave the guy alone everyone........ I have had a few failures myself and it is very fustrating but unfourtunely as my autographing friend said it's apart of the game.

Re: Kiera Knightley FAIL

by bud simpson » Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:25 pm

Considering ALL the sucesses you've had surely you are bound to get some disapointments.

Re: Kiera Knightley FAIL

by Rachel » Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:05 pm

The "been around for 2 minutes" remark is stupid. Firstly, hardly. I'd probably call an actor who had done 1 or 2 films someone who has only been around for 2 minutes. I personally have been a fan of her work since Star Wars over ten years ago. She may not have been around as long as some, but she's been around for a lot longer than a lot of the popular actors today. I'm not defending her but remarks like that are ignorant and also irrelevant. She's either worthy of a wait or she isn't, if you lack respect for her because you THINK she hasn't been around long enough then why are you wasting your own time trying?

Re: Kiera Knightley FAIL

by mymymy » Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:42 am

aparently she has started signing after shows, but only a select few (probably flyers, programes etc) and all she signs is 'K", or a tick
unforunately I wont be heading down for that but good luck to those who try

Re: Kiera Knightley FAIL

by stellar_fuse » Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:46 pm

mymymy wrote: Its clear that when she is ready to leave, they ring the car, she waits by some back door and as sson as she sees the car she dashes out, its so perfectly timed, that in itself shows you shes going to all that effort to avoid people.

Maybe not, maybe it's just the way things worked out. Who knows.

I'm sure you'll get Keira's sig during the run.

Re: Kiera Knightley FAIL

by the_uk_collector05 » Wed Dec 09, 2009 6:08 pm

well some of the successes look authentic but then some look nothing like her sig...i guess its our luck if she signs authentic vv or not..im sending just in case, ya never know :D

Top