by lorraine1980 » Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:59 pm
Andy316 wrote:hilaryfan001 wrote:
I dont see the problem, its not like I said it was authentic or "hand signed" I just said it was not the usual PP because I sent my own pic and it was "signed" AP.
Would you still like me to scan it? or are you not interested anymore?
The "problem" was that you said "its not the usual PP, IT WAS SIGNED" - which implies its authentic, as you used capitals to point out "IT WAS SIGNED".
I do have to agree, using capital letters to say 'IT WAS SIGNED' very much would make someone think that it was an authentic, don't get me wrong I don't think they were trying to make it sound like that at all, but it would be misleading for a lot of people.
[quote="Andy316"][quote="hilaryfan001"]
I dont see the problem, its not like I said it was authentic or "hand signed" I just said it was not the usual PP because I sent my own pic and it was "signed" AP.
Would you still like me to scan it? or are you not interested anymore?[/quote]
The "problem" was that you said "its not the usual PP, IT WAS SIGNED" - which implies its authentic, as you used capitals to point out "IT WAS SIGNED".[/quote]
I do have to agree, using capital letters to say 'IT WAS SIGNED' very much would make someone think that it was an authentic, don't get me wrong I don't think they were trying to make it sound like that at all, but it would be misleading for a lot of people.