Sarah Jessica Parker

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Sarah Jessica Parker

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

by admin » Sun Dec 18, 2011 6:22 pm

Hi Ronnieke :)

Thank you for your feedback {up}

Would you have a scan of the envelope you received please?
If so, you are in the run for the $10 gift certificate.

{star} Sarah Jessica Parker on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

Fanmail 8)

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

by vivalakayla » Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:04 pm

macainautos wrote:Well, if you're going to get technical about it, the user that asked was asking the orignal poster...
& the OP didn't know it was sec, so probably would have told the asking user it's authentic. Making that user write to Sarah, only to recieve a sec signed photo... and believe it's real. Then go on & tell other people it's authentic. Only to have other people waste time & stamps. It's a vicious cycle, really.

If anyone wants to waste time & $$ on a sec - by all means. Gooooo for it! =)

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

by macainautos » Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:08 am

vivalakayla wrote:
Ronnieke wrote:Thanks loveryan for wishing me succes . Secretarial or not I don't mind !! Thanks you guys for the good news telling me it's secretarial . I didn't ask for opinions but that don't hold you guys . I'm happy with my response and that's what matters !

You didn't ask. But the user who wrote below you, did.
Well, if you're going to get technical about it, the user that asked was asking the orignal poster...

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

by vivalakayla » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:58 pm

Ronnieke wrote:Thanks loveryan for wishing me succes . Secretarial or not I don't mind !! Thanks you guys for the good news telling me it's secretarial . I didn't ask for opinions but that don't hold you guys . I'm happy with my response and that's what matters !

You didn't ask. But the user who wrote below you, did.

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

by Ronnieke » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:25 am

Thanks loveryan for wishing me succes . Secretarial or not I don't mind !! Thanks you guys for the good news telling me it's secretarial . I didn't ask for opinions but that don't hold you guys . I'm happy with my response and that's what matters !

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

by loveryan » Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:39 am

Congrats!
At least, you got something ;)

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

by charger88 » Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:47 am

njkelly wrote:These are both secretarials. SJP lives in NYC to begin with. Anything from the LA address is not her signature. Having met her in person and obtaining her autograph, I can tell you 100% that this is not even close to being her signature
It's a good think the guy asked for opinions

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

by njkelly » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:22 am

These are both secretarials. SJP lives in NYC to begin with. Anything from the LA address is not her signature. Having met her in person and obtaining her autograph, I can tell you 100% that this is not even close to being her signature

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

by vivalakayla » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:41 pm

It's sec, unfortunately. =/

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

by Bartosz994 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:28 pm

What do you think, it`s authentic autograph ?
Maybe I will send to her :)

Top