vanhatten wrote:The main thing I learned was Jennifer's J's loop at the top of the J, not the bottom. Her secretary does it backwards and loops the bottom.

I know right! If the secretary is going to do it you'd think she or he would try and make it look convincing!

I guess I'm mean...I tell them it's fake! On FB and friend posted their George Bush success and I told them it was an AP. I can see letting them have that moment, but that moment gets shot to hell when they one day learn that their prized auto is fake. However, I don't always go off the opinions of people on here (this is a different subject) because they are not professionals. For instance, there was a big argument over Doris Day's signature and people kept saying it was fake because an older signature showed her D's different I sent it out to PSA/DNA and they said it was authentic...I put this on the site and what do these non professionals say? That the professionals got it wrong. You can find on Ebay peopel selling signed photos/cards with the different D's and PSA/DNA has said they are real. It's simply her signature has changed.

clash6361 wrote:

redgravedisciple wrote:Why even bother getting them out if it's fake? Would they fear to lose fans? I think they'd be more upset at finding out it was fake than never getting it.

They don't think there are sites like this though most people under... under the ages of around 12 would believe these are real, and the majority between 12 and 18 (if they hadn't seen this site). So they think they're fooling people... which they are... :neutral:

Yup, it's true. I've seen a few people post photos of their Jennifer Lawrence "successes" and even some PPs of other stars in excitement that they signed it just for them on Tumblr, Twitter and FB, and I've had to bite my tongue from telling them otherwise. But I mean, if they're happy...good for them.

redgravedisciple wrote:Why even bother getting them out if it's fake? Would they fear to lose fans? I think they'd be more upset at finding out it was fake than never getting it.

They don't think there are sites like this though most people under... under the ages of around 12 would believe these are real, and the majority between 12 and 18 (if they hadn't seen this site). So they think they're fooling people... which they are... :neutral:

Why even bother getting them out if it's fake? Would they fear to lose fans? I think they'd be more upset at finding out it was fake than never getting it.

redgravedisciple wrote:Actors that send secs or stamp the signature really get me...the fan wants your HAND SIGNED signature. Not your sec or a machines...you don't deserve fanmail if you can't actually answer the fanmail yourself....just not send out replys! Joan Crawford knew how to treat her fans...just not her kids! lol

I think the thing that irks us most (or at least me...) is that we are willing to wait a few months for a genuine response, but their policy is seemingly "get 'em signed, get 'em sent!"

Ah well, at least she seems great at signing In Person.

Actors that send secs or stamp the signature really get me...the fan wants your HAND SIGNED signature. Not your sec or a machines...you don't deserve fanmail if you can't actually answer the fanmail yourself....just not send out replys! Joan Crawford knew how to treat her fans...just not her kids! lol

There's no doubt these are secs. It's really not close to her actual signature.

Shame if it's a secretaries signature, but hey ho!

Katniss21 wrote:Congrats! Hopefully I will be lucky enough to get one back! Notice my username........

They are secs.