That is not to say I trust all PSA/DNA sites 100% It depends on what company it is because I have seen Presidential autopens pass some of their testing.......But I have to say as well she needs to get a new secretary if they can only duplicate her inscription and in 20 years havent learned how to do the D's people expect from her.....Ive tried...theyre not that hard.

OMG....and no I am not 15 LoL but those are the only words......No one discredits Luise Rainer's autograph sent from another country or Joan Fontaine's autograph on here although they are not shakey and one is 10 years older then Doris and the other is probably 20 years give or take older then Doris(Luise)
Why is it so hard to believe ahe actually signs fanmail......Now I know all the emails get replies from Kentucky....but those sent through the mail are replied from California..... Maybe the Kentucky ones are presigned or retarial.....I dont know but I also find it hard to believe Doris Day has not signed one genuine autograph in 20 years........Not one.....Not for Charity...which I saw on a site for a Children's Hospital in England with what people call a secretarial.......I guess maybe she's sooooo old she cant write anymore although 101 y.o. Luise Rainer seems to be able too.

dancingirl1 wrote:

redgravedisciple wrote:I sent my to PSA/DNA and they said it was 100% REAL!

TAKE a photo of your "proof" and prove yourself. This will discard ALL the debaye about her autograph. Show me proof please And if you're telling the truth, I will apologize to the OP. So I will wait for your proof ;)

dancingirl1 wrote:

joe316 wrote: You should actually care about that website because it proves that it isn't a fake PSA/DNA certification. But PSA/DNA did get the this like many other autographs wrong and certified it as real when it was obviously not real.

Well I have seen a few items they "certified" and they are secs and also PP's so NO I don't care what that site says (for certain celebs!).

joe316 wrote: You should actually care about that website because it proves that it isn't a fake PSA/DNA certification. But PSA/DNA did get the this like many other autographs wrong and certified it as real when it was obviously not real.

Well I have seen a few items they "certified" and they are secs and also PP's so NO I don't care what that site says (for certain celebs!).

dancingirl1 wrote:

MW1221 wrote: Then go to PSA's website and click "Cert Verification". What are the odds that they'd pick a random number that just so happens to correspond to that same celebrity's autograph?

IDC about that site...and look @ this...even when it's done SLOPPY it's still the AUTHENTIC WAY, not the sec way: http://www.historyforsale.com/html/prod ... =5&page=96 ;)

You should actually care about that website because it proves that it isn't a fake PSA/DNA certification. But PSA/DNA did get the this like many other autographs wrong and certified it as real when it was obviously not real.

Hi, I know this is a bit old, but this might help. http://youtu.be/9498tVHwKEw

I'm done. LOL!
(*WAITS for a cocky comment from 1 of 3 people...) ;)

Don't argue with it, you're just adding fuel to the fire.

dancingirl1 wrote:And your point is what? "Actress" is still on her resume correct?
If so, that video doesn't mean squat to me because she is trying to play us.

People just don't do a "D" IP and another kind of "D" TTM... lol.
Makes no sense

Why would someone who hasnt made a film in thirty years feel the need to 'play' anyone. And of course I knew some peoples minds wouldnt change. Some peoples defense is shes a crazy Hermit...or shes turned her back on Hollywood....and now its full circle to shes an actress. As far as her D's being differnt through the mail then in person. When was the last time you saw an autograph of Doris Day signed in person?

And your point is what? "Actress" is still on her resume correct?
If so, that video doesn't mean squat to me because she is trying to play us.

People just don't do a "D" IP and another kind of "D" TTM... lol.
Makes no sense