abcdefghigk lmnopqrstwxyz

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail] (new) [comet] [santa] [xmast-tree]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: abcdefghigk lmnopqrstwxyz

Re: abcdefghigk lmnopqrstwxyz

by Usher » Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:32 pm

Twelveby12 wrote:
signTHIS wrote:abcdefghigklmnopqrstwxyz

Mature.
Forgot the "U"

Re: abcdefghigk lmnopqrstwxyz

by Twelveby12 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:14 pm

signTHIS wrote:abcdefghigklmnopqrstwxyz

Mature.

Re: STEVE GUTTENBERG

by TopAutographMan » Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:38 pm

Wow, such animosity coming from the moderator? YIKES! I'll try to stay out his way. I do agree with signTHIS tho about one point: the moderator does seem to have a bit of chip on his shoulder about something other than autographs. signThis said he/she found the moderator's signature line offensive and as a completely unbiased reader, I think I'm more in sighThis' corner than the moderator. Of course the Hilter remarks may have been out of line, but the modetator seems to have some anger issues. I'm not trying to start or continue a senseless fight, but the moderator does come across a bit crass and he seems to lack some positive people skills. But this is just my humble opinion, so please don't hate me for that. I'm brand new here and don't want to start a confrontation with anyone, cause I love all people and we are all here for the sam reason, right?

Re: STEVE GUTTENBERG

by dancingirl1 » Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:47 pm

James wrote: I'm pretty sure Robin's had 100's of more unique items than you have....
Blah blah blah, say what u want....
But you haven't seen my collection. So you don't know.
Assume if you want to. :mrgreen:

Re: STEVE GUTTENBERG

by admin » Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:37 pm

Hi signTHIS :)

Thank you for your feedback {up} Great Success :P

You have been added to the list for the $10 gift certificate.

{star} Steve Guttenberg on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

Fanmail 8)

Re: STEVE GUTTENBERG

by James » Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:10 am

dancingirl1 wrote:4. I have a great life and GREAT autograph collection from tons of rare signers because I actually do the work to find the addresses...SO IM HAPPY :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
I'm pretty sure Robin's had 100's of more unique items than you have....

Re: STEVE GUTTENBERG

by dancingirl1 » Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:44 pm

Twelveby12 wrote:Congrats! Right back to being a prepubescent fool again, impressive. We haven't stopped laughing at how stupid you are on every single post, and that you can't actually clock how much of a fool you are. I look forward to your next moronic post, and your constant need to be at the centre of attention. I take it back by the way, you don't need to get out more, but I would suggest you speak to a therapist about what appears to be a deep rooted fear of not being noticed.

Oh and as a final comment, this forum was set up for fans and collectors to share their feedback, good and bad, not for people to gloat about successes or to hurl abuse. Sadly, with the departure of several regular members and mods from after around 2008-09 it went to pot, after a slow decline in the years preceding that. Posters like you (symptomised by your very transparent attempt at sending a dummy email address to me for a request which was clearly the account you used for your previous account). When this became a playground for Bieber lovers etc it lost its cohesion, and now as they say, the patients rule the asylum.

Don't bother responding to me, I can't fathom how else to tell you that I think you're a waste of space.
1. I can reply to WHATEVER I want.
2. Center of attention? You are the one posting 500 lines to prove a point.
(My replies are quick and painless. Don't read them then.)
3. Well if you want a certain success that doesn't have an address, you (I know i do) work hard to find that address in order to get success and it's not my address to post on a public forum so stop b*tching like a little girl.
4. I have a great life and GREAT autograph collection from tons of rare signers because I actually do the work to find the addresses...SO IM HAPPY :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Re: STEVE GUTTENBERG

by Twelveby12 » Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:11 pm

dancingirl1 wrote:
Twelveby12 wrote:you jumped into a post where the decision had already been made that the signature was not genuine, but you still had to have your wee comment. I'd suggest getting out more.
Hell yea I did...It's a public forum. Don't like that I comment, leave. And if you get "upset" that I comment on a PUBLIC forum, I would suggest getting out more to you! LOL! :mrgreen:
Congrats! Right back to being a prepubescent fool again, impressive. We haven't stopped laughing at how stupid you are on every single post, and that you can't actually clock how much of a fool you are. I look forward to your next moronic post, and your constant need to be at the centre of attention. I take it back by the way, you don't need to get out more, but I would suggest you speak to a therapist about what appears to be a deep rooted fear of not being noticed.

Oh and as a final comment, this forum was set up for fans and collectors to share their feedback, good and bad, not for people to gloat about successes or to hurl abuse. Sadly, with the departure of several regular members and mods from after around 2008-09 it went to pot, after a slow decline in the years preceding that. Posters like you (symptomised by your very transparent attempt at sending a dummy email address to me for a request which was clearly the account you used for your previous account). When this became a playground for Bieber lovers etc it lost its cohesion, and now as they say, the patients rule the asylum.

Don't bother responding to me, I can't fathom how else to tell you that I think you're a waste of space.

Re: STEVE GUTTENBERG

by dancingirl1 » Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:59 pm

Twelveby12 wrote:you jumped into a post where the decision had already been made that the signature was not genuine, but you still had to have your wee comment. I'd suggest getting out more.
Hell yea I did...It's a public forum. Don't like that I comment, leave. And if you get "upset" that I comment on a PUBLIC forum, I would suggest getting out more to you! LOL! :mrgreen:

Re: STEVE GUTTENBERG

by Twelveby12 » Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:54 pm

dancingirl1 wrote:
Twelveby12 wrote:Hey! Dude, James was being nice (as was I) in pointing out our thoughts, and you accepted them with no problems, as it turned out you know that we were all correct. There's no need to jump in like that, especially with comments of that nature.

You're talking about first impressions.. well, I just changed my impression of you. James' signature is pretty much none of your business, and given it's blatantly a humourous comment, which you'd know if you bothered to ask/check/not act like that.

Last time I offer any assistance to you, but of course as dancingirl says "if you believe something is real, then why bother with people telling you it's not".

RM
I didn't use any names so no need to get defensive on me. When I said "ON HERE" I meant the forum as a whole... {up} But I just say things differently and in my own way. They took my way better than yours and I didn't even give an opinion on their item. But it's the way I say certain things. 8)

While I cannot be bothered talking to you, you'll note that the OP had no problem with my post to him. I, however, DO have a problem with the manner in which they conduct themselves, with specific reference to the comparisons they think are acceptable to make. Oh, and they may have taken your post well, but seriously, read it... you jumped into a post where the decision had already been made that the signature was not genuine, but you still had to have your wee comment. I'd suggest getting out more.

Top