Dan Castellaneta

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Dan Castellaneta

Re: Dan Castellaneta

by Twelveby12 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:02 pm

goldencardinal wrote:
Twelveby12, stop acting like a immature baby and posting people names on here. I know you're reffering ot me. I beg you to stop acting like a immature baby for other's sakes.
Yup, maturity is a big issue around here, no doubt about that.

http://postimage.org/image/s0p3ivja7/

Re: Dan Castellaneta

by goldencardinal » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:57 pm

Twelveby12 wrote:
parlamentetfanErik wrote:
MJS73 wrote:Unfortunately Dan Castellaneta uses a ghost signer.
Ehhh no he doesn't, who told you that? I can I agree that he uses a secretary to personalize the photos, but the actuall signature matches his IP 100 %

I would like a new rule on the forum, where any statements like this have to be backed up with factual evidence. Otherwise, posts are going to be over run with posts like this one, and GoldenTroll's.
Twelveby12, stop acting like a immature baby and posting people names on here. I know you're reffering ot me. I beg you to stop acting like a immature baby for other's sakes.

Re: Dan Castellaneta

by Twelveby12 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:36 pm

Send&Signed wrote:
MJS73 wrote:Listen, if you want to delude yourself into thinking they're real, then go ahead, no one is going to stop you. But the purpose of this is to warn others not to send items to him (especially multi-signed items) that will be ruined with a fake signature.

Where is the proof? Or did you listen to the "ghost signer" comment and think it was legit.

I've seen many IP on the internet in the past 30mins to know this is not a sec auto.
They were the poster who made the "ghost signer" comment.

Re: Dan Castellaneta

by Send&Signed » Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:33 pm

MJS73 wrote:Listen, if you want to delude yourself into thinking they're real, then go ahead, no one is going to stop you. But the purpose of this is to warn others not to send items to him (especially multi-signed items) that will be ruined with a fake signature.

Where is the proof? Or did you listen to the "ghost signer" comment and think it was legit.

I've seen many IP on the internet in the past 30mins to know this is not a sec auto.

Re: Dan Castellaneta

by parlamentetfanErik » Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:31 pm

MJS73 wrote:Listen, if you want to delude yourself into thinking they're real, then go ahead, no one is going to stop you. But the purpose of this is to warn others not to send items to him (especially multi-signed items) that will be ruined with a fake signature.

Very well mr wannabe expert let me make this easy for you to understand:

DEDICATION - fake

SIGNATURE - real

wow people on here are so ignorant

Re: Dan Castellaneta

by Twelveby12 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:28 pm

MJS73 wrote:Listen, if you want to delude yourself into thinking they're real, then go ahead, no one is going to stop you. But the purpose of this is to warn others not to send items to him (especially multi-signed items) that will be ruined with a fake signature.
And your proof is where?

Considering I have an IP example which perfectly matches, sitting on the screen in front of me right now.

It's a genuine question, but given you've not provided any proof yet...

Re: Dan Castellaneta

by MJS73 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:09 pm

Listen, if you want to delude yourself into thinking they're real, then go ahead, no one is going to stop you. But the purpose of this is to warn others not to send items to him (especially multi-signed items) that will be ruined with a fake signature.

Re: Dan Castellaneta

by Twelveby12 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:37 pm

parlamentetfanErik wrote:
MJS73 wrote:Unfortunately Dan Castellaneta uses a ghost signer.
Ehhh no he doesn't, who told you that? I can I agree that he uses a secretary to personalize the photos, but the actuall signature matches his IP 100 %

I would like a new rule on the forum, where any statements like this have to be backed up with factual evidence. Otherwise, posts are going to be over run with posts like this one, and GoldenTroll's.

Re: Dan Castellaneta

by parlamentetfanErik » Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:29 pm

MJS73 wrote:Unfortunately Dan Castellaneta uses a ghost signer.
Ehhh no he doesn't, who told you that? I can I agree that he uses a secretary to personalize the photos, but the actuall signature matches his IP 100 %

Re: Dan Castellaneta

by Twelveby12 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:20 pm

MJS73 wrote:Unfortunately Dan Castellaneta uses a ghost signer.
Does his ghost signer also dress up as Dan, go to his venues and sign on his behalf there? #justwondering

Top