Seth MacFarlane success

by **eg9517** » Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:35 pm

luckyas13canbe: I invite you to believe what you wish. Poor little devil. LOL.

by **luckyas13canbe** » Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

eg9517 wrote:
luckyas13canbe wrote:
killempathy wrote:i get what your saying...i know the one is printed. i have personally draw items from others which i do know are in fact real. i dont know if 'sm' is seth macfarlane' or samantha michaels. i could see how a person would only write their ititals tho. i do it at work rather than signing my full name on **** nearly all day long.

my point is no one will know if its seths or a sec minus them. not an atheticator or anything. ive taken a few diff items ive watched signed directly in front of me and be told they were fake. then i showed the people the pic of the person signing them and they felt really retarded.

which is why i said earlier that if i get a responce back im happy with it. preprint or not. i wont fully write it off as authentic but it is a success and id rather get that than nothing at all
As I said, I quite like the PP drawing, it's one of the few occasions where I think a PP could qualify as a success. The "SM"s just have too many differences, in the key letters. Look at the IP "M" for example, it's always higher on the left side, that never happens on the TTM ones. The handwriting on the IP examples is clearly different from the IP handwriting, which wouldn't be something that would change so drastically, while the S on the dedication matches the S on the "SM" "signature".

No, it's possible you never truly know, but when you have IP examples of both signature and handwriting to compare to, you can make a 99% shout on it.

Dear OP, don't bother listening ot luckyas13canbe A.K.A twelveby12! He thinks he's a know it all....he did it to me too.

You're an idiot, you posted fakes. That's why you got caught out. Away and play in the corner GoldenTroll, I was having a civilised discussion with another member, based on evidence. You know what evidence is right? It's the same thing that proved all those fakes you posted, while you sat in your little room claiming they were real and posting under two usernames.

by **eg9517** » Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:17 pm

luckyas13canbe wrote:
killempathy wrote:i get what your saying...i know the one is printed. i have personally draw items from others which i do know are in fact real. i dont know if 'sm' is seth macfarlane' or samantha michaels. i could see how a person would only write their ititals tho. i do it at work rather than signing my full name on **** nearly all day long.

my point is no one will know if its seths or a sec minus them. not an atheticator or anything. ive taken a few diff items ive watched signed directly in front of me and be told they were fake. then i showed the people the pic of the person signing them and they felt really retarded.

which is why i said earlier that if i get a responce back im happy with it. preprint or not. i wont fully write it off as authentic but it is a success and id rather get that than nothing at all
As I said, I quite like the PP drawing, it's one of the few occasions where I think a PP could qualify as a success. The "SM"s just have too many differences, in the key letters. Look at the IP "M" for example, it's always higher on the left side, that never happens on the TTM ones. The handwriting on the IP examples is clearly different from the IP handwriting, which wouldn't be something that would change so drastically, while the S on the dedication matches the S on the "SM" "signature".

No, it's possible you never truly know, but when you have IP examples of both signature and handwriting to compare to, you can make a 99% shout on it.

Dear OP, don't bother listening ot luckyas13canbe A.K.A twelveby12! He thinks he's a know it all....he did it to me too.

by **luckyas13canbe** » Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:14 pm

killempathy wrote:i get what your saying...i know the one is printed. i have personally draw items from others which i do know are in fact real. i dont know if 'sm' is seth macfarlane' or samantha michaels. i could see how a person would only write their ititals tho. i do it at work rather than signing my full name on **** nearly all day long.

my point is no one will know if its seths or a sec minus them. not an atheticator or anything. ive taken a few diff items ive watched signed directly in front of me and be told they were fake. then i showed the people the pic of the person signing them and they felt really retarded.

which is why i said earlier that if i get a responce back im happy with it. preprint or not. i wont fully write it off as authentic but it is a success and id rather get that than nothing at all

As I said, I quite like the PP drawing, it's one of the few occasions where I think a PP could qualify as a success. The "SM"s just have too many differences, in the key letters. Look at the IP "M" for example, it's always higher on the left side, that never happens on the TTM ones. The handwriting on the IP examples is clearly different from the IP handwriting, which wouldn't be something that would change so drastically, while the S on the dedication matches the S on the "SM" "signature".

No, it's possible you never truly know, but when you have IP examples of both signature and handwriting to compare to, you can make a 99% shout on it.

by **killempathy** » Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:54 pm

i get what your saying...i know the one is printed. i have personally draw items from others which i do know are in fact real. i dont know if 'sm' is seth macfarlane' or samantha michaels. i could see how a person would only write their ititals tho. i do it at work rather than signing my full name on shit nearly all day long.

my point is no one will know if its seths or a sec minus them. not an atheticator or anything. ive taken a few diff items ive watched signed directly in front of me and be told they were fake. then i showed the people the pic of the person signing them and they felt really retarded.

which is why i said earlier that if i get a responce back im happy with it. preprint or not. i wont fully write it off as authentic but it is a success and id rather get that than nothing at all

by **luckyas13canbe** » Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:36 pm

killempathy wrote:i get what you were saying guy. when mine comes i will spend the few bucks and get it authenticated

Aye, ok, you do that. Completely pointless. If you can't see from looking at them yourself, then you're beyond hope on this one. Seriously... just look at the IP examples, look at the key differences, and think about it logically.

I'll say again, if Seth was taking the time to dedicate the printed drawings, there's no way in hell he would just scribble an SM on other items, and equally no chance that it would be so different.

I'm genuinely not arguing about this, simply stating what everyone knows. And that's before you get near the "ability" "quality" and "knowledge" of these so called authenticators, especially ones which charge peanuts.

by **killempathy** » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:37 pm

i get what you were saying guy. when mine comes i will spend the few bucks and get it authenticated

by **luckyas13canbe** » Thu Mar 07, 2013 10:13 am

Hatsawayfan wrote:It's not worth an argument. I am assuming the sketches are fake too. I agree, If its not real, its not successful. Case closed.

The sketches are printed, and the PP signature on the sketches matches his best signature, so no issue there. This is one of the few occasions where I think a printed item is a bit "cool" simply because it's a printed artwork. None of it leads to having Seth's autograph, so fully agree, case closed, even if some people seem to not quite understand that the basis of autograph collecting is getting an autograph.

by **Hatsawayfan** » Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:42 pm

It's not worth an argument. I am assuming the sketches are fake too. I agree, If its not real, its not successful. Case closed.

by **killempathy** » Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:57 pm

ok ... you go on with your collecting

Seth MacFarlane success

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: Seth MacFarlane success

Re: Seth MacFarlane success

Re: Seth MacFarlane success

Re: Seth MacFarlane success

Re: Seth MacFarlane success

Re: Seth MacFarlane success

Re: Seth MacFarlane success

Re: Seth MacFarlane success

Re: Seth MacFarlane success

Re: Seth MacFarlane success

Re: Seth MacFarlane success


Fanmail.biz	Message Board