Hugh Grant success

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Hugh Grant success

Re: Hugh Grant success

by luckyas13canbe » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:06 am

Lorena wrote:I think that over 90 % of signatures signed in person are different from those we receive TTM. Penélope Cruz also signed many autographs in person and they're far different from those, that a couple of us received TTM. It's not a valid argument for me.

Your choice of percentage is bizarre, I'm sorry but there is no way 90% of autos differ IP/TTM, and especially not to this extent.

Re: Hugh Grant success

by trevor1066 » Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:44 pm

Lorena wrote:I think that over 90 of signatures signed in person are different from those we receive TTM. Penélope Cruz also signed many autographs in person and they're far different from those, that a couple of us received TTM. It's not a valid argument for me.

yes i agree.. i woudnt say 90% tho i would say 50 \50

that isnt hugh grants signiture that he signs in person..thats all i was saying.. i have looked into it and its a sec

Re: Hugh Grant success

by Lorena » Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:28 pm

I think that over 90 % of signatures signed in person are different from those we receive TTM. Penélope Cruz also signed many autographs in person and they're far different from those, that a couple of us received TTM. It's not a valid argument for me.

Re: Hugh Grant success

by Send&Signed » Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:35 pm

Dunno. Certainly seems very suspect. If I would have to guess I'd say sec. But that's my opinion.

His IP is very different and for me, the way this is written is not similar To the way he writes. But remember thats just my opinion.

Re: Hugh Grant success

by tracy771028 » Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:23 am

so sad :cry:

I send him last year maybe December..
but didn`t come back..
I don`t know why... :? :(

Re: Hugh Grant success

by trevor1066 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:42 pm

BoeingGuy777 wrote:Trevor1066, where is your proof? What make you state that he didn't sign with such conviction?

A friend of mine got hugh grants autograph in person last october his sig was identical too this
http://www.memorabilia4u.com/data/items ... 3-orig.jpg

All his authentic sigs are very similar too that. If you google them you will see..


Now why would he sign all his TTM different too how he signs in person?

Re: Hugh Grant success

by luckyas13canbe » Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:36 pm

I've long had my doubts about Hugh Grant signatures, simply because of the number of different signatures which have come from "Hugh" over the years. I'm not sure, but I lean towards not being genuine.

Re: Hugh Grant success

by matula1977 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:53 am

This is interesting - I got exatly the same autograph as you and also sent back on the same date as you 05. 03. 2013 9:00pm - which is on the envelope. I posted it 26. 2. 2013 and got back today (I´m not from UK).
M.

Re: Hugh Grant success

by cutmemic » Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:44 am

Ahhhh brilliantly crafted and well thought out responses Now I am convinced Trevor1066 :roll:

Re: Hugh Grant success

by BoeingGuy777 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:19 am

Trevor1066, where is your proof? What make you state that he didn't sign with such conviction?

Top