@Countpaul, it is actually his step mom that handles his mail, not his sister as it is thought by many.

Also, you are correct about his ttms and his IPs never matching at the end. The IPs always end in a second loop whereas his ttms have a little upside down checkmark thing.

I agree about the wait time not meaning anything though as there are many who have quick consistant turn arounds(i.e. Amanda Seyfried, Tim Allen, Henry Winkler, Ed Asner, etc). They all reply in a very short amount of time.

But in Travoltas case everyone is correct in saying these are not authentic, even if John claims them to be. Its just not possible that NONE of his ttms would end in the 2nd loop he ALWAYS gives IP.

I used to think these were real too until I realized no IP ever ended in the upside down checkmark and no ttm in atleast the past several years had ended in the loop. I sent a few of dvd covers to Travolta to sign and now have sec signed DVDs, it irritates me.

Hope to meet John IP someday and pull my fake signed dvds out for him to actually sign.

Also as someone pointed out I have never ever seen a reply from this address where the end of his signature matches his in person signatures and vice versa. One would think that the in persons would vary more and the TTM would vary more and they dont. Some might say he spends more time on the TTM ones. Well he wouldnt really if he's signing a huge stack not to mention when I saw him there were only two other fans there.

I used to think these had a chance to be real...that perhaps he presigned some photos and his sister inscribed them. When I got my in person autograph I could tell they were not signed by the same person.

luckyas13canbe wrote:

supertoneman wrote:sorry about that, i misread what you meant.

Easily done - I am rather mad at the best of times.

So we can call you the mad lucky then at times, lol.

supertoneman wrote:sorry about that, i misread what you meant.

Easily done - I am rather mad at the best of times.

sorry about that, i misread what you meant.

supertoneman wrote:

luckyas13canbe wrote:I suspect the OP posted this to get a reaction, as the laughable "Judi Dench signs so Travolta could" argument is bordering on the absurd.

What I would like to see are the verified IP examples which match these, as I've always said, no photo, no argument.

i do agree that since noone has been able to prove that this or some of the others are secs by posting a photo of an in person one. we have no real proof we will have to assume that they are real. i myself have just went by others, but it could be that he does have time now days to send replies. so my opinion is this until there is proof then this is real. congrats on the success none the less

There are plenty of examples online of IP ones which DON'T match, I'm more interested in seeing the ones which DO match this.

luckyas13canbe wrote:I suspect the OP posted this to get a reaction, as the laughable "Judi Dench signs so Travolta could" argument is bordering on the absurd.

What I would like to see are the verified IP examples which match these, as I've always said, no photo, no argument.

i do agree that since noone has been able to prove that this or some of the others are secs by posting a photo of an in person one. we have no real proof we will have to assume that they are real. i myself have just went by others, but it could be that he does have time now days to send replies. so my opinion is this until there is proof then this is real. congrats on the success none the less

I suspect the OP posted this to get a reaction, as the laughable "Judi Dench signs so Travolta could" argument is bordering on the absurd.

What I would like to see are the verified IP examples which match these, as I've always said, no photo, no argument.

http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum ... oked-at-by


I suppose you still believe in the tooth fairy too if after all this you still believe that's authentic.