Edward Norton Success!

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Edward Norton Success!

Re: Edward Norton Success!

by T I N Y » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:59 pm

vivalakayla wrote:You are truly ridiculous - I said it was forum etiquette not to bump posts. People with manners don't bump posts. If you feel like you need to bump posts do it. (I guarantee you if you bumped a bunch of posts on purpose Admin would do something - he's not a fan I annoying either. ) But you'll just be annoying in everyone's eyes on this forum. Not that you care anyways because you are simply a troll trying to start stuff.
Understand this...I'M NOT TROLLING YOU! I'm speaking facts. There's no rules against it. But I still can't see how it would really bother some to read an old post. This site is for enjoyment. And it just makes me mad when someone tries to tell someone how to enjoy them selves. So the guy bumped an old thread..So what...It's not that big of a deal. He wanted an answer.I bet if it was some autograph one of the "don't bump " crowd wanted and couldn't send a pm they would bump it too.Plus they've been bumping this old thread for 3 days now.....lol See it's really not that big of a deal.

Re: Edward Norton Success!

by vivalakayla » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:12 am

stillluckyas13canbe wrote:
vivalakayla wrote:
Uh yeah actually it has. I've been a member here since 2005 and it's always been the same. Go troll somewhere else.
Take a bow, excellent post. I tend to believe those that post less than 15 times in two years of being a "member" are just trying to stir up trouble.

As Ian Hart once said....


TROLL... in the DUNGEON!!
:) glad someone agrees with me!

Re: Edward Norton Success!

by vivalakayla » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:11 am

You are truly ridiculous - I said it was forum etiquette not to bump posts. People with manners don't bump posts. If you feel like you need to bump posts do it. (I guarantee you if you bumped a bunch of posts on purpose Admin would do something - he's not a fan I annoying either. ) But you'll just be annoying in everyone's eyes on this forum. Not that you care anyways because you are simply a troll trying to start stuff.

Re: Edward Norton Success!

by stillluckyas13canbe » Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:38 am

vivalakayla wrote:
Uh yeah actually it has. I've been a member here since 2005 and it's always been the same. Go troll somewhere else.
Take a bow, excellent post. I tend to believe those that post less than 15 times in two years of being a "member" are just trying to stir up trouble.

As Ian Hart once said....


TROLL... in the DUNGEON!!

Re: Edward Norton Success!

by T I N Y » Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:07 am

vivalakayla wrote:
T I N Y wrote:
vivalakayla wrote:
It's been forum etiquette/rule for YEARS not to bump old topics. ;-) that's what a private message is for.
Not really been etiquette/rule for years...lol but whatever...but what if people don't accept private messages?
Then you bump it to get your answer.
Uh yeah actually it has. I've been a member here since 2005 and it's always been the same. Go troll somewhere else.
Uh no actually it hasn't...The rules to this forum say nothing about it so guess what....Just like I've been saying....THERE'S NO RULE.Maybe a few people think that they don't want others bumping old threads but there is not a rule that says not to..Besides who decides what an old thread is? Is it so many days, weeks or what???So see I'm not trolling I'm for real. Just because a couple guys says it. Does NOT make it a rule.And untill the owner of this site tells me that it's a rule. I'll stand up for the guy that bumped the thread.You can spin it or twist it anyway you want but the FACT is I'M RIGHT AND THERE'S NOTHING ANYONE CAN DO ABOUT IT.BECAUSE LIKE I SAID SOMEONES OPINION DOES NOT MAKE IT A RULE.

Re: Edward Norton Success!

by vivalakayla » Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:14 pm

T I N Y wrote:
vivalakayla wrote:
T I N Y wrote: 1. People can bump what ever they want. So don't try and run the forum.Or I'll go back to the beginning of the posts and start with the first one and bump all day. :mrgreen:
2. The address was given out. So your wrong to assume his post was for nothing.
It's been forum etiquette/rule for YEARS not to bump old topics. ;-) that's what a private message is for.
Not really been etiquette/rule for years...lol but whatever...but what if people don't accept private messages?
Then you bump it to get your answer.
Uh yeah actually it has. I've been a member here since 2005 and it's always been the same. Go troll somewhere else.

Re: Edward Norton Success!

by T I N Y » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:14 pm

vivalakayla wrote:
T I N Y wrote: 1. People can bump what ever they want. So don't try and run the forum.Or I'll go back to the beginning of the posts and start with the first one and bump all day. :mrgreen:
2. The address was given out. So your wrong to assume his post was for nothing.
It's been forum etiquette/rule for YEARS not to bump old topics. ;-) that's what a private message is for.
Not really been etiquette/rule for years...lol but whatever...but what if people don't accept private messages?
Then you bump it to get your answer.

Re: Edward Norton Success!

by T I N Y » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:11 pm

stillluckyas13canbe wrote:
T I N Y wrote:
stillluckyas13canbe wrote:
1. Please do not bump old posts.
2. It is very clear that the OP will not share this as it is a "home address" success.
1. People can bump what ever they want. So don't try and run the forum.Or I'll go back to the beginning of the posts and start with the first one and bump all day. :mrgreen:
2. The address was given out. So your wrong to assume his post was for nothing.
Really? You post twice in a year and then threaten to go bump old topics just to be annoying? I reckon someone needs to get out a little bit more. It is an accepted rule of any forum, especially one with such high volume as this, that old posts don't get bumped. It's bad manners, poor online etiquette and generally annoying. Congrats on looking like a total fool, it's impressive for one who posts so little.
Just because I don't post doesn't mean I'm not here. And I didn't say I would bump to be annoying. I said I would do it because they were being an ass about it.But as for an accepted rule....lol No it's not..there's no rule that says don't bump old posts.And as far as looking like a fool...no that would be you for making up imaginary rules for the whole worlds forums....lol

Re: Edward Norton Success!

by stillluckyas13canbe » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:02 am

T I N Y wrote:
stillluckyas13canbe wrote:
1. Please do not bump old posts.
2. It is very clear that the OP will not share this as it is a "home address" success.
1. People can bump what ever they want. So don't try and run the forum.Or I'll go back to the beginning of the posts and start with the first one and bump all day. :mrgreen:
2. The address was given out. So your wrong to assume his post was for nothing.
Really? You post twice in a year and then threaten to go bump old topics just to be annoying? I reckon someone needs to get out a little bit more. It is an accepted rule of any forum, especially one with such high volume as this, that old posts don't get bumped. It's bad manners, poor online etiquette and generally annoying. Congrats on looking like a total fool, it's impressive for one who posts so little.

Re: Edward Norton Success!

by vivalakayla » Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:12 am

T I N Y wrote: 1. People can bump what ever they want. So don't try and run the forum.Or I'll go back to the beginning of the posts and start with the first one and bump all day. :mrgreen:
2. The address was given out. So your wrong to assume his post was for nothing.
It's been forum etiquette/rule for YEARS not to bump old topics. ;-) that's what a private message is for.

Top