Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fail.

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fail.

Re: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fai

by vivalakayla » Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:15 pm

Normanbotts wrote:
That is BS as I never posted on this thread recently until you jumped in a year later DURRRRR!!!!!!

You are literally stupid. You don't even have any knowledge about autographs and don't help this community any so, I have nothing else to say to you. {up}

Re: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fai

by Normanbotts » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:02 am

vivalakayla wrote:
Normanbotts wrote:

I was simply pointing out too you that the post was a year old as you obviously never checked and you were not aware of that. There was no need for you too respond in such a rude and argumentive manner. What's up are you frustrated?
No, someone who thinks PP means pre-signed couldn't possibly make me frustrated. :lol: There was literally no point in your post because you also posted on this thread recently. And I will respond as any way I see fit when someone is rude to me for no reason! ;-) DURRRRR.

That is BS as I never posted on this thread recently until you jumped in a year later DURRRRR!!!!!!

Re: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fai

by vivalakayla » Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:54 am

Normanbotts wrote:

I was simply pointing out too you that the post was a year old as you obviously never checked and you were not aware of that. There was no need for you too respond in such a rude and argumentive manner. What's up are you frustrated?
No, someone who thinks PP means pre-signed couldn't possibly make me frustrated. :lol: There was literally no point in your post because you also posted on this thread recently. And I will respond as any way I see fit when someone is rude to me for no reason! ;-) DURRRRR.

Re: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fai

by dancingirl1 » Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:47 am

TheArtist wrote:or a busy B***h. don't insult her just because she's trying to make something of her life

Re: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fai

by Normanbotts » Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:40 am

vivalakayla wrote:
Normanbotts wrote:
It's over a year since he posted that so why you telling him that now!!!!
DURRRRR :roll:
Because other people bumped up the entire topic far before I responded, making it look like a recent topic. THATS WHY, DURRRRRR. :roll: Glad you picked me out everyone else who posted Feb 2014. Thanks! :roll:

I was simply pointing out too you that the post was a year old as you obviously never checked and you were not aware of that. There was no need for you too respond in such a rude and argumentive manner. What's up are you frustrated?

Re: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fai

by vivalakayla » Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:16 am

Normanbotts wrote:
It's over a year since he posted that so why you telling him that now!!!!
DURRRRR :roll:
Because other people bumped up the entire topic far before I responded, making it look like a recent topic. THATS WHY, DURRRRRR. :roll: Glad you picked me out everyone else who posted Feb 2014. Thanks! :roll:

Re: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fai

by Normanbotts » Mon Feb 10, 2014 2:36 am

vivalakayla wrote:Yeah no way would I send DVD covers. Photos will do just as fine. I'm sorry!
It's over a year since he posted that so why you telling him that now!!!!
DURRRRR :roll:

Re: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fai

by goswannies » Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:21 am

mantas wrote:
goswannies wrote: 3) if the dvd cover is that valuable to you in the first place, why send it?!?
Why ? Only original is true 8) {up} That's my opinion.
True enough, but you're mostly collecting the autograph, right? A signed color copy of the DVD cover can be slipped in front of the original cover in the case. Just a thought (coz ive done it in the past)

Re: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fai

by mantas » Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:44 pm

goswannies wrote: 3) if the dvd cover is that valuable to you in the first place, why send it?!?
Why ? Only original is true 8) {up} That's my opinion.

Re: Gemma Arterton WORST "Success" I ever got. More like fai

by goswannies » Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:21 pm

1) the celebs aren't asking you to send them stuff. We are in fact essentially invading their privacy. Mostly celebs are pretty generous in replying, but they are under no obligation to.

2) there is always a risk of losing stuff you send (postal service loses it, celeb loses it or mixes it up with the plethora of other stuff they receive, agent loses it, celeb/agent can't be bothered returning something they didn't ask for in the first place etc)

3) if the dvd cover is that valuable to you in the first place, why send it?!? Surely a better option is to spend an extra 15c and color photocopy the DVD cover and send the copy for signing. That way if you lose it there wont
be such a need for offensive, vitriolic, profanity filled verbal tirades against busy celebs who never asked us to write to them in the first place.

Top