John Travolta 2nd success!

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: John Travolta 2nd success!

Re: John Travolta 2nd success!

by rainbownessie3 » Wed May 08, 2013 10:16 pm

I have a few PP but that's bc it's from celeb merch. All the other ones are authentic. Can we drop it now?

Re: John Travolta 2nd success!

by Zaj » Wed May 08, 2013 10:07 pm

rainbownessie3 wrote:Honestly I don't like you (luckyas13canbe). You're personality ****. And I agree, your maturity level is like a 5 year old. Maybe someone wants the return address. It's still nice to have. I don't care that he didn't sign it, I'm just glad they responded to my email. You need to seriously calm down. I'm SO* tired of you calling me dumb, because I'm not. I'm WAY more classy than you. Ignore the post if it bothers you! If you have nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all. Thanks!
Well, since you're fine with just a response, regardless whether it's real or not... then e-mail me. I'll send you Babe Ruth, George Washington, and King Tut's autographs.

Re: John Travolta 2nd success!

by Sairentu » Wed May 08, 2013 9:56 pm

rainbownessie3 wrote:You don't need to comment. All my other autographs are authentic.
I don't need, but I can. There are plenty of PPs listed in your signature. Those are not authentic autographs.

Re: John Travolta 2nd success!

by luckyas13canbe » Wed May 08, 2013 9:53 pm

rainbownessie3 wrote:Honestly I don't like you (luckyas13canbe). You're personality ****. And I agree, your maturity level is like a 5 year old. Maybe someone wants the return address. It's still nice to have. I don't care that he didn't sign it, I'm just glad they responded to my email. You need to seriously calm down. I'm SO* tired of you calling me dumb, because I'm not. I'm WAY more classy than you. Ignore the post if it bothers you! If you have nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all. Thanks!
Please try to understand the essence of the problem... it's not real, it didn't come from John Travolta and if you like the pic you could have printed it out yourself. It doesn't matter if someone wants the return address because (1) it's been published here more times than you've had hot dinners and (2) writing ttm gets the same results as the email. I'm glad you're happy THEY responded to your email, if you want someone else hard to get, feel free to send me a PM, I'll respond to you with a signed pic of your choice and I guarantee it will be just as pleasing to you.

You're throwing a charming little hissy fit there, but I don't think I actually called you "dumb", I simply said I didn't think you were reading the posts through. If you don't like what I say, then use the block button, but I (and many other members, evidenced in this very thread) won't allow fakes to be posted and claimed as real. The first time it's usually polite (from most members, I can't account for some), but the fact you did it twice with the same person, within days indicates that you don't care about the integrity of the forum. Even then, my comment was still light hearted. You can believe you're classy if you wish, I've got no reference on that one, so I can't (and wouldn't) comment, all I know is that like many people on this forum, you seem to miss the key points of what an autograph is meant to be. Oh, and I'm perfectly calm thanks, aside from the really annoying pain from a tooth extraction I had yesterday, thanks for checking.

This is, however, the problem with the internet. Anyone can post anything. If you don't want people to point out you have non authentics, then don't post them.

Re: John Travolta 2nd success!

by rainbownessie3 » Wed May 08, 2013 9:49 pm

Sairentu wrote:
rainbownessie3 wrote:Honestly I don't like you (luckyas13canbe). You're personality ****. And I agree, your maturity level is like a 5 year old. Maybe someone wants the return address. It's still nice to have. I don't care that he didn't sign it, I'm just glad they responded to my email. You need to seriously calm down. I'm SO* tired of you calling me dumb, because I'm not. I'm WAY more classy than you. Ignore the post if it bothers you! If you have nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all. Thanks!
There's nothing rude or immature with what luckyas13canbe has to say. Nothing. He's also right. You can enjoy your collection of PPs and fake autographs and we will always say that your "success" is of a pile of cr?p if it is. To each his own.
You don't need to comment. All my other autographs are authentic.

Re: John Travolta 2nd success!

by Sairentu » Wed May 08, 2013 9:33 pm

rainbownessie3 wrote:Honestly I don't like you (luckyas13canbe). You're personality ****. And I agree, your maturity level is like a 5 year old. Maybe someone wants the return address. It's still nice to have. I don't care that he didn't sign it, I'm just glad they responded to my email. You need to seriously calm down. I'm SO* tired of you calling me dumb, because I'm not. I'm WAY more classy than you. Ignore the post if it bothers you! If you have nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all. Thanks!
There's nothing rude or immature with what luckyas13canbe has to say. Nothing. He's also right. You can enjoy your collection of PPs and fake autographs and we will always say that your "success" is of a pile of cr?p if it is. To each his own.

Re: John Travolta 2nd success!

by rainbownessie3 » Wed May 08, 2013 9:27 pm

Honestly I don't like you (luckyas13canbe). You're personality sucks. And I agree, your maturity level is like a 5 year old. Maybe someone wants the return address. It's still nice to have. I don't care that he didn't sign it, I'm just glad they responded to my email. You need to seriously calm down. I'm SO* tired of you calling me dumb, because I'm not. I'm WAY more classy than you. Ignore the post if it bothers you! If you have nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all. Thanks!

Re: John Travolta 2nd success!

by luckyas13canbe » Wed May 08, 2013 7:43 pm

Münchausen wrote: I'm always with you until about 2/3 through every single one of your posts, when you start insulting me again. I'm 21, so I would consider myself young, but definitely not a "kid". So what you're saying makes no sense... unless you're, like, 70 years old in which everyone seems like a kid to you. If you are somehow older than me, which I doubt highly, your maturity level is that of an 8 year old. This will be my last response to you.

Awesome, you're finally giving up.

I'll leave with you three points.

1. Always check your facts, shockingly enough I am older than you. If you're going to object to being criticised, it helps if you don't hurl unwarranted abuse about. I may not be 70, but I'm sorry, I just don't class 21 as being mature. I remember when I thought it was, namely on my 21st, but you know, as you grow older you realise a few things. I note you didn't have a go at anyone else who pointed out it's not real, but then again, it's easy to hide behind a username and make comments where you choose eh?
2. You've still not accounted for how you could join a forum before it was created, or why you think an autograph which could have been collected up to four and half years ago proves this. I find this page quite useful http://whois.net/whois/fanmail.biz
3. When you've clicked that link, check this one out. It sums things up nicely. http://youtu.be/rY0WxgSXdEE

Now if only Travolta responses could be barred from the forum it would be a much more pleasant place.

Re: John Travolta 2nd success!

by supertoneman » Wed May 08, 2013 7:38 pm

James wrote:This is hilarious. Is the Doctor in the house? Has he time travelled back to visit the forum before it even began? This is blowing my mind.
i could not help but laugh at this james. i am just sitting back with a bag of popcorn watching this. heck i know i have not been on here very long. i have determined that the issues that the server has been having issues, cause of SQL code that has been wrote into the server. hopefully the server could get repaired and up to speed like it was. it is that or it needs more server space :). i am just going on what i know of computers with my degree. i don't get all fired up on this site cause it is not worth getting all stressed over. unless you see these people in person every day why let it get to you. people know what they got and being it is a free forum they have freedom of speech. i just brush it off and if you want to take and be happy with what you got then it is what it is. hopefully the OP can get their own authentic eventually, and can say that they have an authentic autograph.

Re: John Travolta 2nd success!

by Munchausen » Wed May 08, 2013 7:18 pm

luckyas13canbe wrote:
Münchausen wrote:
luckyas13canbe wrote:
Here's what confuses me about your comments, bear with me a moment.

You weren't to know I have been a member here since January 2005, and have changed my username so that's fair enough. I do, however, not understand why you're objecting to maintaining levels of integrity in the forum. There are LOADS of posts on here which don't get comments, this doesn't indicate that an item is real or not. The only that allows members (including the person who got the response) is it being proven that this is not the case. I don't claim to know everything, and indeed frequently defer to others, especially when it comes to US signatures, but due to the nature of my collecting I do have a pretty sound knowledge of what's going on.

Fake responses lead to members losing out, wasting time and money, potentially trading with unscrupulous members because they don't know better.

Of course, what really impresses me is that you've been on this forum since 2002, given that the Admin is member no1, and his join date is in 2004.
Well, I don't know what to tell you. Maybe the forum came after the creation of the actual website. If you don't believe me, I could show you my authentic Ringo Starr I got through this website when I was 11-12 years old. As you should know, he hasn't signed fan mail for years now, due to arthritis and carpal-tunnel syndrome. Though, I could not care less of whether you do believe me or not, since you missed my whole point of "seniority" being pointless. Each member has the same worth around here, so members that have been here since 2005 have no more importance than somebody that just came on. Not wanting people to waste their time and money is admirable, but only if one did it admirably... not like a bully. Rather than saying: "Fake! I can't believe you would post this once, let alone twice. Don't you know you're wasting everyone's time?", go for: "Unfortunately, that looks like a secretarial to me. Sorry that happened to you, man. Better luck next time! :)". See the difference? First one is just outright being mean and the second is actually being helpful and supportive.

Okay, here's the thing. It's not about seniority, I simply stated that some members were trying to bring the forum back to the quality it was previously, you're the one who kicked off about dates and cited impossible dates. As one of the early members of this forum, I do actually remember when it was a good forum (actually, anything up to a few years ago was pretty good before the Bieber/Lovato crew started flooding it with fakes and ****). The OP posted this "success" after already being told the first one they got days before was fake (not by me I add), and even then my first comment was firmly tongue in cheek, and I wasn't the first to point it out to them. You will, however, forgive me for not taking your comments too seriously, especially when the evidence you provide to prove you've been on board since before the forum was created is an autograph which could have been collected any time up to 2008. I do like how you're putting words into my mouth, I don't believe I actually used the phrase you claim I did. If I posted the same fake twice in a row, I'd expect flack. If I post any fake, I'd expect to be told as it could have got past me. Thanks for the lesson on manners though, it's appreciated from someone who's fresh to the forum, has done nothing to help it over the years and reckons they can snipe about it. I especially love it when kids try to act more mature than they are and fail spectacularly. You could have saved us all a lot of bother by either checking your facts first, or indeed not spouting some spectacularly misinformed information.
I'm always with you until about 2/3 through every single one of your posts, when you start insulting me again. I'm 21, so I would consider myself young, but definitely not a "kid". So what you're saying makes no sense... unless you're, like, 70 years old in which everyone seems like a kid to you. If you are somehow older than me, which I doubt highly, your maturity level is that of an 8 year old. This will be my last response to you.

Top