Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

Re: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

by arwen3108 » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:39 pm

I think so the "d" of "radcliffe is exactly located in the crook of his neck on both pictures and I tkink the thankfulness is written by himself ( i hope so !!) you had to write him a great letter :) I will also write a letter to him and I hope it will please him as !!!

Re: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

by friendsissy » Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:35 pm

jamiso wrote:Wow this is interesting and new! My opinion is that if this success is not authentic, it's probably an AP(?). it's clearly not a PP.
The best way for me to test if the autograph is printed onto the photo is to shine light underneath the photograph. Judging from the photo you posted, it does not look like a pre-print to me as the position and strokes of the autograph is different from the standard PPs he usually sends. Plus, the indiactaion seems handwritten. It seems like the person who inscribed the photo looks like he signed it as well as the handwriting are parellel.

Image


I tried to and comparison of the original PP.
I think the signature is the same.

Re: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

by friendsissy » Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:30 pm

IzaBellatrix wrote:I would say that this dedication could be authentic http://harry-potter-kolekcja.blog.onet. ... radcliffe/

I don't think I remember I sent me VV address, but the site should be above the VV.And I can't read his writing.. :oops:

Re: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

by friendsissy » Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:28 pm

Jaymz887 wrote:congrats on the picture. someone else filled in the rest. the autograph is his. I found the same picture with autograph when I searched his name+autograph. but nice thing is your got a response. to me its all about the enjoyment of autograph collecting.
congrats again

jaime


I always thought that it is not his type, and name is printed up and the word is written up.

Re: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

by friendsissy » Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:26 pm

luckyas13canbe wrote:It's def his standard PP signature, strange that more has been added,but yeah, I'd think it is just a sec, as if he'd done it himself he would have signed it properly as well. Ah well, a little different.

Truth be told, there's so little point in writing to Dan via agent, it makes me wonder why people still waste time on it.

Yes, I think this si SEC and the name is PP.
I'm just very strange how can have such a letter

Re: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

by luckyas13canbe » Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:04 pm

jamiso wrote:
Unlike you two, I am not from the UK, so I am afraid not many would understand your inside joke. LOL
yes, it's astoundingly difficult to figure out.

Re: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

by luckyas13canbe » Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:03 pm

I took minor offence that you implied I was stupid as I couldn't see what you could, and was wrong, as well as being blind for thinking this was a PP. That was the problem there, when I presented the information you still decided to be arrogant. Might be my problem, but then again, I would suggest its yours. Anyways, case closed, as it's a PP, and there's no need for the OP to think they might have a genuine one, just because you're not capable of checking feedback on this very site.

Re: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

by jamiso » Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:00 pm

James wrote:
jamiso wrote:
luckyas13canbe wrote:
Before you both talk down to someone, and imply that someone with a heck of a lot of experience is stupid and/or blind, you might want to do some simple checks.

http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic.php?t=282055
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic.php?t=294035
You can say whatever you want, but the fact is clearly out there.. I am just voicing my opinion, as are you. If you don't agree with my thoughts, that's your problem, not mine!
Should've Gone To Specsavers.
Unlike you two, I am not from the UK, so I am afraid not many would understand your inside joke. LOL

Re: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

by jamiso » Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:58 pm

luckyas13canbe wrote:
jamiso wrote:
luckyas13canbe wrote:
Before you both talk down to someone, and imply that someone with a heck of a lot of experience is stupid and/or blind, you might want to do some simple checks.

http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic.php?t=282055
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic.php?t=294035
You can say whatever you want, but the fact is clearly out there.. I am just voicing my opinion, as are you. If you don't agree with my thoughts, that's your problem, not mine!
Just to check... did you look at the links?

I fully agree that on the link you provided is a PP example. I'm also aware that more than one PP is out there for Dan, and if you can't see that the one on this post is identical to the two links I provided from this very site, as well as numerous others, then you're doing nothing but showing yourself up there. As I said, best to check facts before making offensive comments to posters.
I did see the links, and yes, I now see the resemblance of the position of the autographs after juxtaposing the images. From checking, I noticed there are different PPs out there and it makes a difference in terms of which specific PP you are comparing the post to. Like I said, I am just voicing my opinion and observation. If you took offense to what I said, that is your problem, not mine.

Re: Daniel Radcliffe SEC+PP???????

by luckyas13canbe » Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:56 pm

James wrote:
jamiso wrote:
luckyas13canbe wrote:
Before you both talk down to someone, and imply that someone with a heck of a lot of experience is stupid and/or blind, you might want to do some simple checks.

http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic.php?t=282055
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic.php?t=294035
You can say whatever you want, but the fact is clearly out there.. I am just voicing my opinion, as are you. If you don't agree with my thoughts, that's your problem, not mine!
Should've Gone To Specsavers.

:D
Moderator Quote of the Year!

Top