by SportsFan2342 » Wed Jun 12, 2013 1:35 am
im not disagreeing with you but more questioning your argument. psa/dna isnt very reliable when it comes to authenticating autographs. But then again there isnt really anyone better to get in person autos/ttms/ etc authenticated by since companies like steiner, upper deck, panini will only authenticate their own items. ive heard too many stories about psa/dna being trash. as for the in person autos, athletes can sign differently in person than they do for ttm, cant they? i know some do that.
CHIgrapher wrote:TheArtist wrote:secretarial
His TTMs are failing PSA.
And IP graphers say the sigs don't match up at all.
im not disagreeing with you but more questioning your argument. psa/dna isnt very reliable when it comes to authenticating autographs. But then again there isnt really anyone better to get in person autos/ttms/ etc authenticated by since companies like steiner, upper deck, panini will only authenticate their own items. ive heard too many stories about psa/dna being trash. as for the in person autos, athletes can sign differently in person than they do for ttm, cant they? i know some do that.
[quote="CHIgrapher"][quote="TheArtist"]secretarial[/quote]
His TTMs are failing PSA.
And IP graphers say the sigs don't match up at all.[/quote]