SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

Re: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

by Daniel_Lassiter » Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:49 pm

stillluckyas13canbe wrote:
beckyloveschris13 wrote:Dose it matter if it is a non authentic it is still a autograph it dose not matter if it is a non authentic or not

Seriously? Seriously?

Does it matter if the "autograph" is genuine? If it doesn't matter, you might as well sign your photos yourself.

Surely the whole point in writing to get a signed item is that the item comes back signed by the person you write to? If not, then I have this whole game all wrong, and could be making millions by selling Tom Hanks signatures signed by myself.
^^^^
Bravo! That is most certainly the most logical thing I've read and yet people refuse to accept it lol. Awesome {up} 8)

D.L.

Re: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

by IzaBellatrix » Mon Oct 14, 2013 3:06 pm

I am completly agree with stillluckyas13canbe. This is public forum and FEEDBACK so you can post AP, PP, ps or sec but don't public success there.
This is normal that stars sent other photos when they send PP (like Robbie or Bonnie) or PS(like Bill Nighy). Sometimes secrectar/star confused photos and switch them. But that's no reason to stop sending photos. stillluckyas13canbe is very hepful person as many ppl here.
For me and for many ppl here only AUTHENTIC signature is SUCCESS. Beleive me it does matter. Why waste money and get PP when You can print it from google? It's good to know who send PP, AP or SEC after sending a letter. That's why is this forum for.

Re: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

by natty222 » Mon Oct 14, 2013 1:13 pm

stillluckyas13canbe wrote: Okay, no one is disputing you sent her a letter asking for an autograph, and no one is disputing this is what you got back. The point being raised is that it's not been genuinely signed by Sarah Jessica Parker, and if you knew that (as you said in one post previously) then it's best to label it as such. For example, "Received - Preprinted Signed Photo" or "I got this photo back, sadly it's a PP".

If you don't know it's not a genuine signature when you receive it, fair enough, but several members pointed this out politely on this, and other threads (ie the Bonnie Wright one), and your response was to go ape at members who were trying to help. Members will always be happy to help if you ask for advice on the signature, and equally members will always point out if it's not genuine, for just the reasons I have given already... to prevent others from wasting time and money.

Feedback is feedback, be it a genuine signature, a PP or an RTS, but you have to label accordingly so no one else makes the same mistake as (most!) collectors prefer a real signature, for obvious reasons.
{up}

Re: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

by stillluckyas13canbe » Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:10 pm

beckyloveschris13 wrote:I did send her a letter asking for her autograph & the picture I put on here is what I got back it is the only one I got from her
Okay, no one is disputing you sent her a letter asking for an autograph, and no one is disputing this is what you got back. The point being raised is that it's not been genuinely signed by Sarah Jessica Parker, and if you knew that (as you said in one post previously) then it's best to label it as such. For example, "Received - Preprinted Signed Photo" or "I got this photo back, sadly it's a PP".

If you don't know it's not a genuine signature when you receive it, fair enough, but several members pointed this out politely on this, and other threads (ie the Bonnie Wright one), and your response was to go ape at members who were trying to help. Members will always be happy to help if you ask for advice on the signature, and equally members will always point out if it's not genuine, for just the reasons I have given already... to prevent others from wasting time and money.

Feedback is feedback, be it a genuine signature, a PP or an RTS, but you have to label accordingly so no one else makes the same mistake as (most!) collectors prefer a real signature, for obvious reasons.

Re: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

by beckyloveschris13 » Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:00 pm

I did send her a letter asking for her autograph & the picture I put on here is what I got back it is the only one I got from her

Re: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

by James » Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:47 am

Wow, on that logic, if authenticity doesn't matter then I have the autographs from all my most wanteds. Wow, thanks for bringing this revelation into my life! I can retire a happy autograph collector :mrgreen:



Oh, wait..

Re: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

by stillluckyas13canbe » Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:46 am

beckyloveschris13 wrote:Dose it matter if it is a non authentic it is still a autograph it dose not matter if it is a non authentic or not

Seriously? Seriously?

Does it matter if the "autograph" is genuine? If it doesn't matter, you might as well sign your photos yourself.

Surely the whole point in writing to get a signed item is that the item comes back signed by the person you write to? If not, then I have this whole game all wrong, and could be making millions by selling Tom Hanks signatures signed by myself.

Re: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

by beckyloveschris13 » Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:42 am

Dose it matter if it is a non authentic it is still a autograph it dose not matter if it is a non authentic or not

Re: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

by stillluckyas13canbe » Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:24 am

beckyloveschris13 wrote:Well u are telling to STOP posting some picture u do not tell me what I can & cannot do if I want to put pictures on here I will so do not tell tell me what I can & cannot do

Care to read the posts again?
I said it would be a good idea to mark them as being "non authentic" so that inexperienced collectors don't make a mistake in thinking they can get an authentic autograph through those contacts. Put the pictures where you want, there's loads of non authentics posted here, though I don't class them as a success, they are still feedback.

Re: SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

by beckyloveschris13 » Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:22 am

Well u are telling to STOP posting some picture u do not tell me what I can & cannot do if I want to put pictures on here I will so do not tell tell me what I can & cannot do

Top