by stillluckyas13canbe » Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:51 pm
reachingrwanda2014 wrote:Nail Varnish Remover Would Remove The Ink Around the P as well, so it is inked, it's not a PP,
Either AP Or Authentic.
Lewis
It looks very much like the signatures are being printed on the photos as and when required, meaning they are being run through after the original photos are printed, hence not a traditional PP. The chances of identical placement of AP signatures would be unlikely, but the bottom line is that we could all see from the outside that these were not genuine and as such it doesn't actually matter what method is being employed... they're not real, and that means they are worth squat.
How you can even consider those to be anything but non authentic is beyond me, and leads me to suggest you do a thorough check of all items you have before auctioning them to avoid any potential issues.
I have no doubt some of these will appear from various ebay sellers, and they will be bought in good faith. Let's do our bit to make sure it doesn't happen.
[quote="reachingrwanda2014"]Nail Varnish Remover Would Remove The Ink Around the P as well, so it is inked, it's not a PP,
Either AP Or Authentic.
Lewis[/quote]
It looks very much like the signatures are being printed on the photos as and when required, meaning they are being run through after the original photos are printed, hence not a traditional PP. The chances of identical placement of AP signatures would be unlikely, but the bottom line is that we could all see from the outside that these were not genuine and as such it doesn't actually matter what method is being employed... they're not real, and that means they are worth squat.
How you can even consider those to be anything but non authentic is beyond me, and leads me to suggest you do a thorough check of all items you have before auctioning them to avoid any potential issues.
I have no doubt some of these will appear from various ebay sellers, and they will be bought in good faith. Let's do our bit to make sure it doesn't happen.