Cameron Diaz Success (?)

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

Re: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

by vivalakayla » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:28 pm

trevor1066 wrote:

It's obvious too me that the 7 autographs on the left are her authentic and the ones on the right are secs which are the same as I got ttm. All secs. Anybody think any different then they are deluded.
Yes! Definitely secs. Having the photos right next to each other like that help see all the differences. I always had doubts on her autographs just because of her comments about autographs and signing. She signed in those books just to promote and make more money. She's even hard to get IP.

Re: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

by dancingirl1 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:42 am

trevor1066 wrote: the 7 autographs on the left are her authentic

Re: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

by admin » Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:31 am

Hi NickG :)

Thank you for your feedback {up}

When did you receive it please?

{star} Cameron Diaz on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

Fanmail 8)

Re: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

by trevor1066 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:51 am


It's obvious too me that the 7 autographs on the left are her authentic and the ones on the right are secs which are the same as I got ttm. All secs. Anybody think any different then they are deluded.

Re: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

by vivalakayla » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:19 am

There are differences. (The heart, the "for", the c and d and z in her signature) - Up side by side like that helps, a lot. I believe she may just have a food sec who studied her autograph and fries to do the best they can to get it like hers

Re: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

by lautnerfied » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:13 am

Image
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater

Re: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

by vivalakayla » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:08 am

mcjw2011 wrote:
Maybe it's just an IP thing? With TTM replies she doesn't have to deal with actual people thrusting pictures, magazines, etc at her to sign. She can sign at her leisure TTM. Like you said, those eBay IP links you put up... they're very similar to the TTM replies people get.

NickG, I recommend you hold onto them. At least until you can get someone to authenticate it or prove its a sec.
Years ago I remember her saying she didn't find any point to autographs. Which would assume TTM, in person etc. But you definitely could be right.

I still have mine. So yeah, hold onto them!

Re: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

by mcjw2011 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:06 am

vivalakayla wrote:She's been known to hate signing autographs. So it makes her TTM successes seem like they are secs. In person successes show she signs her full name. And her TTM looks not much like her IP.
Maybe it's just an IP thing? With TTM replies she doesn't have to deal with actual people thrusting pictures, magazines, etc at her to sign. She can sign at her leisure TTM. Like you said, those eBay IP links you put up... they're very similar to the TTM replies people get.

NickG, I recommend you hold onto them. At least until you can get someone to authenticate it or prove its a sec.

Re: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

by vivalakayla » Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:38 pm

trevor1066 wrote:They are secs and im pretty sure..its very obvious too me. but a lot of people want too think different about these sigs so thats fine.. :mrgreen:
That's what I was thinking they were, too. Until I saw that book signed at Target with the signature that looks pretty similar to the TTM. Now I kind of second guess myself.

Re: Cameron Diaz Success (?)

by trevor1066 » Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:32 pm

They are secs and im pretty sure..its very obvious too me. but a lot of people want too think different about these sigs so thats fine.. :mrgreen:

Top