Julie andrews bad succes

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Julie andrews bad succes

Re: Julie andrews bad succes

by Lucky73 » Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:13 pm

redgravedisciple wrote:While what you said is true, the fan is very much what keeps them in the business. If you don't see their movie, the offers get fewer and fewer...just ask the cast of Twilight lol Even Joan Crawford knew that! Call her what you will, she knew her fans were the most important!

I have had one celebrity treat me like dirt. I had spent just a $100 on their theater ticket not too mention the NYC airfare and hotel and they just ignored me and my ONE photo! I was the ONLY person waiting and they saw me and walked quickly past me into the building.

THAnKS REDGRAVEDISCIPLINE, i think like you.

i send you a message email

Re: Julie andrews bad succes

by rocco.campanaro » Wed Apr 09, 2014 2:02 pm

Collectors should stop being soo fusssy and pissed of with celebrities who can't write back. they have other committments. we're not their priority. I'd rather Julie go on tour expressing her talent than stay at home signing mail.

Re: Julie andrews bad succes

by redgravedisciple » Sun Mar 30, 2014 3:30 am

While what you said is true, the fan is very much what keeps them in the business. If you don't see their movie, the offers get fewer and fewer...just ask the cast of Twilight lol Even Joan Crawford knew that! Call her what you will, she knew her fans were the most important!

I have had one celebrity treat me like dirt. I had spent just a $100 on their theater ticket not too mention the NYC airfare and hotel and they just ignored me and my ONE photo! I was the ONLY person waiting and they saw me and walked quickly past me into the building.

Re: Julie andrews bad succes

by dancinggirl » Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:26 am

Lucky73 wrote:
Lucky73 wrote:
Lucky73 wrote:Hello

Julie andrews

very unhappy with this succes.

photo

Image

Nothing signed, ... but she sends 1 photo "official" ................... :cry: :cry: :cry:

P.O BOX 491668. LOS ANGELES , CA 90049-8668 USA

send 29-10-13



received, 12-2-14


thanks fanmail.

Thanks for the comments of people who understood me. Sometimes I like events and sometimes not. A happens to us all. If I want to test whether a famous sign me want my money and my time. It is a matter of illusion, it's a hobby. It's my opinion. I will not respond any more. Thank you.

IN CASTILIAN CLASSIC: NO ME TOQUES MAS LOS COJONES
NO ME TOQUES MAS LOS COJONES A lA TOOCHA EST BEA/lOOP

Re: Julie andrews bad succes

by Lucky73 » Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:51 pm

Lucky73 wrote:
Lucky73 wrote:Hello

Julie andrews

very unhappy with this succes.

photo

Image

Nothing signed, ... but she sends 1 photo "official" ................... :cry: :cry: :cry:

P.O BOX 491668. LOS ANGELES , CA 90049-8668 USA

send 29-10-13

received, 12-2-14


thanks fanmail.


Thanks for the comments of people who understood me. Sometimes I like events and sometimes not. A happens to us all. If I want to test whether a famous sign me want my money and my time. It is a matter of illusion, it's a hobby. It's my opinion. I will not respond any more. Thank you.

IN CASTILIAN CLASSIC: NO ME TOQUES MAS LOS COJONES

Re: Julie andrews bad succes

by Lucky73 » Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:45 pm

Lucky73 wrote:Hello

Julie andrews

very unhappy with this succes.

photo

Image

Nothing signed, ... but she sends 1 photo "official" ................... :cry: :cry: :cry:

P.O BOX 491668. LOS ANGELES , CA 90049-8668 USA

send 29-10-13

received, 12-2-14


thanks fanmail.


Thanks for the comments of people who understood me. Sometimes I like events and sometimes not. A happens to us all. If I want to test whether a famous sign me want my money and my time. It is a matter of illusion, it's a hobby. It's my opinion. I will not respond any more. Thank you.

Re: Julie andrews bad succes

by MW1221 » Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:37 pm

Lucky73 wrote:
MW1221 wrote:
redgravedisciple wrote:Celebs who don't sign in person when it could be very easy and take 2 seconds, bother me. Your fans are what make you and if you can't pause for 5 seconds and sign something, then you're just a jerk. One day it'll stop and they'll long to have that one fan waiting for a signature.

As for Julie, I'm sure she gets hundreds of photos a week--but the **** response of "I don't own the copyright" is what gets me with her.

What gets me is that, despite her misunderstanding of Copyright law, people on this thread still insist that she signs photos through that address.

As for your other comment, I disagree.

Celebrities are paid whether people go see the movie or not.

They're made by the studios who give them a platform, by their agents who get them roles, by their publicists who put them in the lime light.

If you pay to go see a movie, you're owed that movie, nothing more.

That said, I think some celebs are jerks because of the blowoffs they use in person. They don't have to sign, but they don't have to be a jerk about it.

Thanks for the comments of people who understood me. Sometimes I like events and sometimes not. A happens to us all. If I want to test whether a famous sign me want my money and my time. It is a matter of illusion, it's a hobby. It's my opinion. I will not respond any more. Thank you.
Are you replying to the comment you quoted, because not even one word of that was directed at you...?

Re: Julie andrews bad succes

by Lucky73 » Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:20 pm

MW1221 wrote:
redgravedisciple wrote:Celebs who don't sign in person when it could be very easy and take 2 seconds, bother me. Your fans are what make you and if you can't pause for 5 seconds and sign something, then you're just a jerk. One day it'll stop and they'll long to have that one fan waiting for a signature.

As for Julie, I'm sure she gets hundreds of photos a week--but the **** response of "I don't own the copyright" is what gets me with her.

What gets me is that, despite her misunderstanding of Copyright law, people on this thread still insist that she signs photos through that address.

As for your other comment, I disagree.

Celebrities are paid whether people go see the movie or not.

They're made by the studios who give them a platform, by their agents who get them roles, by their publicists who put them in the lime light.

If you pay to go see a movie, you're owed that movie, nothing more.

That said, I think some celebs are jerks because of the blowoffs they use in person. They don't have to sign, but they don't have to be a jerk about it.

Thanks for the comments of people who understood me. Sometimes I like events and sometimes not. A happens to us all. If I want to test whether a famous sign me want my money and my time. It is a matter of illusion, it's a hobby. It's my opinion. I will not respond any more. Thank you.

Re: Julie andrews bad succes

by MW1221 » Fri Mar 28, 2014 8:36 pm

redgravedisciple wrote:Celebs who don't sign in person when it could be very easy and take 2 seconds, bother me. Your fans are what make you and if you can't pause for 5 seconds and sign something, then you're just a jerk. One day it'll stop and they'll long to have that one fan waiting for a signature.

As for Julie, I'm sure she gets hundreds of photos a week--but the **** response of "I don't own the copyright" is what gets me with her.

What gets me is that, despite her misunderstanding of Copyright law, people on this thread still insist that she signs photos through that address.

As for your other comment, I disagree.

Celebrities are paid whether people go see the movie or not.

They're made by the studios who give them a platform, by their agents who get them roles, by their publicists who put them in the lime light.

If you pay to go see a movie, you're owed that movie, nothing more.

That said, I think some celebs are jerks because of the blowoffs they use in person. They don't have to sign, but they don't have to be a jerk about it.

Re: Julie andrews bad succes

by redgravedisciple » Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:51 pm

Celebs who don't sign in person when it could be very easy and take 2 seconds, bother me. Your fans are what make you and if you can't pause for 5 seconds and sign something, then you're just a jerk. One day it'll stop and they'll long to have that one fan waiting for a signature.

As for Julie, I'm sure she gets hundreds of photos a week--but the crap response of "I don't own the copyright" is what gets me with her.

Top