Gordon Ramsay Success

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Gordon Ramsay Success

Re: Gordon Ramsay Success

by RachelG » Tue Nov 08, 2016 4:43 am

Again nobody asked for your negative opinion troll.

The admin does not care about what you think or how many posts you have and neither does any members on here so your talking to yourself or that brick wall in front of you.


Search through your very own posts and count the negative ones....

Who's the troll.

Re: Gordon Ramsay Success

by DiamondDave » Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:12 pm

RachelG wrote:
DiamondDave wrote:
AutographDiva wrote:Wishing this site was a little more modern so we would edit things posted on our own post. That would take care of a LOT of drama on here.
Or having an Admin that allowed moderators to "moderate". This could be a spectacular site, but it's lost in all the spam and trolls.


Nobody asked for your opinion. Take your negativity elsewhere troll.
RachelG has 32 posts. Has posted no successes, and a quick search of their posts will easily show that the majority of their 32 posts on this site are of negativity.

Just another troll.

Would be nice to see admin begin eliminating this type of behavior. Perhaps warnings, suspensions and such.

Re: Gordon Ramsay Success

by RachelG » Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:09 am

DiamondDave wrote:
AutographDiva wrote:Wishing this site was a little more modern so we would edit things posted on our own post. That would take care of a LOT of drama on here.
Or having an Admin that allowed moderators to "moderate". This could be a spectacular site, but it's lost in all the spam and trolls.


Nobody asked for your opinion. Take your negativity elsewhere troll.

Re: Gordon Ramsay Success

by DiamondDave » Sun Nov 06, 2016 5:25 pm

AutographDiva wrote:Wishing this site was a little more modern so we would edit things posted on our own post. That would take care of a LOT of drama on here.
Or having an Admin that allowed moderators to "moderate". This could be a spectacular site, but it's lost in all the spam and trolls.

Re: Gordon Ramsay Success

by AutographDiva » Sun Nov 06, 2016 4:04 pm

Wishing this site was a little more modern so we would edit things posted on our own post. That would take care of a LOT of drama on here.

Re: Gordon Ramsay Success

by DiamondDave » Sun Nov 06, 2016 1:04 pm

WillyWonka11 wrote:It must be rough living in a world where everyone except yourself is a troll...
Not everyone. Just a portion of this site. Troll.

Re: Gordon Ramsay Success

by WillyWonka11 » Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:10 pm

It must be rough living in a world where everyone except yourself is a troll...

Re: Gordon Ramsay Success

by DiamondDave » Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:11 pm

AutographDiva wrote:Congrats on your success. Sorry that other members can not resist commenting when unwarranted. As a general rule, I only comment on authenticity when it is requested. Unfortunately, not every one is as polite.
Trolls will be trolls.

Re: Gordon Ramsay Success

by DiamondDave » Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:10 pm

Alfie1997 wrote:Dave.


It's a free forum and people can post their opinions if they wish. Even if you haven't asked! For them.
This is a discussion forum

The simple solution for you if you don't want any feedback is for you not to bother posting your successes. {up}

If you don't like people commenting that that's what you should do. As you can't stop them... it's as simple as that.

Have a nice day sir :D
I did not ask for your opinion.

Re: Gordon Ramsay Success

by RachelG » Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:22 pm

AutographDiva wrote:Congrats on your success. Sorry that other members can not resist commenting when unwarranted. As a general rule, I only comment on authenticity when it is requested. Unfortunately, not every one is as polite.

Apparently Nobody asked for your opinion. So best not comment.

Top