by Blackhawks026 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:43 am
I got my picture back signed & dedicated today too. I believe they are real, and here's why: She is known to use an autopen (which these clearly are NOT), so if she were to send out fakes, they would be autopenned and not sec signed. See what I'm saying? If she's got an autopen, then why bother using a sec when the autopen could do all the work? Personally, I believe that all her signatures that are NOT autopenned, are indeed personally signed by Mrs. Palin herself. Anyone agree? Disagree?
I got my picture back signed & dedicated today too. I believe they are real, and here's why: She is known to use an autopen (which these clearly are NOT), so if she were to send out fakes, they would be autopenned and not sec signed. See what I'm saying? If she's got an autopen, then why bother using a sec when the autopen could do all the work? Personally, I believe that all her signatures that are NOT autopenned, are indeed personally signed by Mrs. Palin herself. Anyone agree? Disagree?