Hi RELWOB :)

Thank you for your feedback {up}

{star} [url=http://www.fanmail.biz/12854.html]Ernie Banks[/url] on Fanmail.biz | [url=http://www.fanmail.biz/feedback/Ernie_Banks.html]Previous Feedback(s) Received[/url]

Fanmail 8)

This is real! I went to Cooperstown Induction Week a few years ago and got this in person....I think it matches up pretty good....


Sorry for the blurriness!

[url=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/408/95550270.jpg/][img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/7924/95550270.jpg[/img][/url]

[quote="macainautos"]bigfoot is an idiot, that's a real auto. He's just trying to rain on your parade. Just another bigmouth with no proof...

R-Mac[/quote]
Been collecting over 40 years, have the authentic autographs of nearly every HOF member. There are variations between Ernie's signature and that of his ghost signer. Both capital letters are off and the ks is questionable, as well. It's well known that Ernie does not sign TTM without a fee. In the oft chance that Ernie actually signed this item for you, congrats, but I wouldn't hold my breath on it.

bigfoot is an idiot, that's a real auto. He's just trying to rain on your parade. Just another bigmouth with no proof...

R-Mac

[quote="Eddie08"]The E and the B look just a little off but the "rnie" and "anks" look pretty good. If it is fake, I'd say it's a pretty good secretary he has.[/quote]

i also thought the B looked a bit off but the E looked pretty consistent to me. any & most secs i have ever seen have been pretty clear sec sigs. Im not saying blatant obvious returns like Tony Gonzalez for example but sec returns that you can tell a small effort was made, but pretty clear not who the intended signers sig.

also the return times dont add up for secs, I know they could easily wait for a pile of mail then sign but then wouldnt the sigs look even more like an obvious sec sig? I base this off of someone blowing through mail to just be done, not someone taking there time. I tend to think these are the real deal untill proven wrong & would need solid evidence as to why. not someone with a simple " Fake/secretarial " post.

The E and the B look just a little off but the "rnie" and "anks" look pretty good. If it is fake, I'd say it's a pretty good secretary he has.

[quote="bigfoot215"]Secretarial.[/quote]

why do you think this is a "Secretarial"? If your going to say such a thing you prolly should elaborate. Im not expert & doubt you are but the certs i see on ebay look pretty close to the same as this one.

[quote="bigfoot215"]Secretarial.[/quote]

I thought it looked pretty good compared to other signatures I've seen from him. Any other opinions on this?

Secretarial.

That is an tremendous success from him have not seen that many I need to try him {up} {up} {up}