New York Post Cartoon: Connecting Chimp Attack With Obama?

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: New York Post Cartoon: Connecting Chimp Attack With Obama?

Re: New York Post Cartoon: Connecting Chimp Attack With Obama?

by Mighty_Modders » Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:25 am

People are very quick to start chucking round words like 'racist' and 'offensive'. thats what stirs up bother, probably more a case of a fairly thick cartoonist rather than the start of some hate-war.

that and the fact that is referring to an actual event with an actual chimp...its not like they went out of their way to put a chimp in for no good reason. people read what they want into things like this.

i found it more offensive that a 70 year old widow was allowed to keep a 15 stone chimp in her house...think thats slightly more worth getting bothered about than a cartoon.

Re: New York Post Cartoon: Connecting Chimp Attack With Obama?

by mhammen » Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:03 am

Being rude, tasteless, or worse yet (for a cartoonist) - not funny, does not automatically make it racist. The word "racist" implies a hateful, almost criminal intent. I think this was an insensitive, poorly thought out lampoon. America values it's free speech, and Barack Obama's presidency will give us numerous opportunities to address the race issue. Let's not look for offense until we can show that it was intentional.

Top