I see your point about how disappointing it can be to click on a topic and there be no image, but as Jason said, it's near to impossible to enforce due to their being no way of recording them.

Also, it's not like every person is going to post 28 no image successes in a week, so limiting them to 2-5 seems like a daft idea to me. If they do get more in one week, they have to wait a week to post it. Why? Why does waiting one week mean there's less to look through? It'll only be there the week later. And if they get more than the allowed quota next week too, they have to wait again. They might never catch up.

I really dont think the idea is workable, or fair on those people, frankly. The forum is about testing and sharing addresses at the end of the day, not viewing the pretty pictures.

x hayley x wrote:

aamir wrote:I don't post scans but only pictures from my phone.
Is that okay?

Yes as long as pictures are posted then it doesn't matter what device they came from! I either take pictures using my digital camera or my webcam. There are so many ways to get pictures on here!

People should still be able to post no scanner ones but we need a way of making it so everytime I click a success its not a no scan. It seems like everytime I click on one on the homepage, its a no scan.

aamir wrote:I don't post scans but only pictures from my phone.
Is that okay?

Yes as long as pictures are posted then it doesn't matter what device they came from! I either take pictures using my digital camera or my webcam. There are so many ways to get pictures on here!

aamir wrote:I don't post scans but only pictures from my phone.
Is that okay?

That's just fine, all we want mainly is just some way of photographing or scanning the autograph so we can see it.

I don't post scans but only pictures from my phone.
Is that okay?

LOL. Yeah I get kinda annoyed at some of those posts too. That's usaully why I only reply in ones that have scans. {thumb2} But you'll never have to worry about clicking on mine. I always post scans along with my success. {thumb2}

RYAN J.

Although it is pretty annoying to click on a thread to find "sorry, no scanner" at the bottom of their post, it is still good to see that the celebrity is responding to fanmail. But I do think that they could just be posting any random celebrity feedback just for the sake of it, or to get their post count up. If they don't do it very often then fair enough, but it there's somebody doing it most days then I do have my doubts. I don't think there is much we could do about it really though unfortunately.

I really don't think this is nessasary, some members do not have scanners but their feedback information is still appreciated. Also, your suggestion that we "limit" the number of feedbacks might be quite hard to enforce as the system does not know how to automatically stop members from posting a certin amount of feedbacks with no scans per week.

Im not saying that they CANT post Im just saying they should limit it to 2 to 5 no scans per person per week, that way they're still there, the forum just isnt overrun by them.

Well, I have to agree, because you can't see. But not everyone has a scanner, and they're allowed to post, too, aren't they? I think it'd be much better instead if they have scans they can check off that little *With Pics* smiley at the top, that will show in the Feedback forum, or they can post *No Scanner* in the title. That's just my suggestion. {thumb2}

{??}Kelsey