Subforums

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Subforums

Re: Subforums

by lizane » Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:26 pm

Larisie wrote:If there was an RTS subforum, who honestly would go there? Almost 100% of the time members are going to want to see the successes and not the RTS's and I think its necessary to see them, so they should just stay as one forum all together. It'd be too much work to have them separate, imo.

Larisie
I completely agree with Larisie. ;) It is neccessary to see the RTS's too. How else will you know if an address work or not? The "Feedback" forum should stay as it is, some people are already posting via venue feedback in the "Feedback" forum!

Thanks! ;)

Re: Subforums

by whosurdaddy » Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:04 am

I think there should be something where you can post RTS, Refused etc. and after 3- 5 months( up to Admin.)where you should be able to post that you have not gotten a response. That doesn't mean you may not get one but it would give members on here an idea when writing what may be the average response time. Definately would cut down on alot of questions posted in the forums. LOL. I know this is a bad word on here but Star Tiger has it where you can look and see exactly what is going on with that certain celeb. what is being received and gives you a good idea how long it takes and the percentage of requests out and the percentage of what has been received etc. Granted this is a free site and does alot of members a huge service and it may be asking too much. PP's, autopens, secretarials whatever, some will consider those failures, other's on here don't. That's irrelevent. If you consider doing this it should just be RTS, Refused, waiting time. I'm off my soap box. :lol:

Re: Subforums

by Thumper » Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:18 pm

I agree with Andy

But, in my opinion, a RTS is the only type of failure. You get something back if you get a PP, AP, Secretarial or just a photo.

Re: Subforums

by *~ Skydreamer ~* » Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:48 pm

its an great idea to have subforums.Forum is better with these subforums.Thanks {thumb2}

Re: Subforums

by Larisie » Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:52 am

If there was an RTS subforum, who honestly would go there? Almost 100% of the time members are going to want to see the successes and not the RTS's and I think its necessary to see them, so they should just stay as one forum all together. It'd be too much work to have them separate, imo.

Larisie

Re: Subforums

by Carmelo15 » Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:13 am

I agree that we should have a RTS sub-forum. It would just be too confusing to have AP and PP forums.

Re: Subforums

by dgangel » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:00 am

I would want to see successes, and RTS's. If there was a ap/pp forum made, I wouldn't visit it, it would weed out a lot of the garbage in the feedback section. I think it would be something good to add to this site.

Re: Subforums

by efro » Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:39 am

I think there should be 'Success' and 'RTS' forums. AP, Secretarial, PP, etc forum are needless.

Eduard {thumb2}

Re: Subforums

by danny2010 » Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:30 am

dgangel wrote:I think there should be a preprint/autopen sub forum. But, some members will deny that their autograph is an autopen or preprint, and wouldn't post theirs there. Moderators could move the correct threads to the correct place though.
i completely agree :D

Re: Subforums

by Atomic ant » Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:28 am

Oh dear. This may end up the is it is'ot it forum.

Almost everyone on this site, would have a diffront answer. It would never work, it's hard enough when someone says that an autograph is not authentic.

Top