Boards under "attack"...

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!

Image Search the message board Image

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Boards under "attack"...

Re: Boards under "attack"...

by jasonw » Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:03 am

zanne wrote:Jason I never said you're taking their side. :neutral: I was simply stating my main concern, which is their "mass attack" - I don't care which clubs send fakes.
All right then {up}

Re: Boards under "attack"...

by lizane » Tue Jan 06, 2009 10:10 am

Jason I never said you're taking their side. :neutral: I was simply stating my main concern, which is their "mass attack" - I don't care which clubs send fakes.

Re: Boards under "attack"...

by jasonw » Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:18 am

zanne wrote:Thank you ozzman and Jason. {thumb2}
jasonw wrote:I too have been suspicious about some of the autographs Chelsea sends out for a while; perhaps a new topic should be made regarding this matter. However, their attitudes are worrying and it is clear that they cannot present your argument in a mature way and therefore is contributing to the prevention of an intellectual discussion to take place :neutral:

If they change their attitude, start being more mature then we will talk about Chelsea sending fakes {thumb2}

Jason.
Jason, the main problem isn't the fact that they call English clubs' autographs secretarial (although it's very far from true - they say "all English clubs", they're not even specific so they just lie), but the way they do it. They spread it in a very aggresive manner, clearly upset about the fact that Juve sends secretarials, and they want to get back at us all, which is ridiculous. {down} I guess a link to that topic has probably been posted on some Polish forum and now they're all angry about it.

Feel free to post anything about Chelsea in the "Is My Autograph Authentic?" forum, but I don't think now is a good time because they will most certainly ruin the topic, just look what has happened to that Juventus thread. :neutral:

Thanks guys!! {up}
zanne
As I have stated, I am concerned about their attitudes too, it's just that I would like to point out my opinion on some of Chelsea's autographs, and by the way, West Ham is another English club that sends fakes.

I have the feeling that you are getting me wrong here - I am not encouraging or supporting the ridiculous behavior and attitudes of those individuals who are clearly trying to pick fights and are incapable in participating in an intellectual autograph discussion.

Jason 8)

Re: Boards under "attack"...

by Shambler » Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:46 am

Liz, thank you so much for banning them! {up} I wanted to do it myself but wasn't sure if what they were doing warranted a ban. I had to clean up some poor person's Nemenja Vidic success last night, deleting all these completely untrue posts saying that Man United (and other English clubs) send fakes. I haven't checked the logs to see if you've banned him, but 'mason' in particular is a very problematic member :?

Re: Boards under "attack"...

by lizane » Tue Jan 06, 2009 6:19 am

Thank you ozzman and Jason. {thumb2}
jasonw wrote:I too have been suspicious about some of the autographs Chelsea sends out for a while; perhaps a new topic should be made regarding this matter. However, their attitudes are worrying and it is clear that they cannot present your argument in a mature way and therefore is contributing to the prevention of an intellectual discussion to take place :neutral:

If they change their attitude, start being more mature then we will talk about Chelsea sending fakes {thumb2}

Jason.
Jason, the main problem isn't the fact that they call English clubs' autographs secretarial (although it's very far from true - they say "all English clubs", they're not even specific so they just lie), but the way they do it. They spread it in a very aggresive manner, clearly upset about the fact that Juve sends secretarials, and they want to get back at us all, which is ridiculous. {down} I guess a link to that topic has probably been posted on some Polish forum and now they're all angry about it.

Feel free to post anything about Chelsea in the "Is My Autograph Authentic?" forum, but I don't think now is a good time because they will most certainly ruin the topic, just look what has happened to that Juventus thread. :neutral:

Thanks guys!! {up}
zanne

Re: Boards under "attack"...

by jasonw » Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:27 am

I too have been suspicious about some of the autographs Chelsea sends out for a while; perhaps a new topic should be made regarding this matter. However, their attitudes are worrying and it is clear that they cannot present your argument in a mature way and therefore is contributing to the prevention of an intellectual discussion to take place :neutral:

If they change their attitude, start being more mature then we will talk about Chelsea sending fakes {thumb2}

Jason.

Re: Boards under "attack"...

by ozzman » Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:09 pm

I just banned another one from their little click.

Boards under "attack"...

by lizane » Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:44 pm

Hi all! ;-)

I'd just like you all to keep an eye on some Polish members here (newly joined ones) who're currently spamming the board with lies about English clubs sending fakes and only joining the site for the reason to pick fights with others. :neutral: Mr Kennedy (Andy) pm'ed me about this. {up} It got so out of control that I had no choice to ban them (most already had a warning) - if you do not agree with my action, please feel free to unban them. I just thought I should let you all know to keep an eye on these and other problematic members, especially ones who only joined recently (thus, they will not use this site for any other reason than picking fights). :roll: See this topic.

Thanks,
zanne

Top