by elmomommyto2 » Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:17 pm
Ok, and here's the latest very questionable post made by whosurdaddy:
whosurdaddy wrote:Hey Dredguy,
Quite honestly you ranting and raving the same nonsense before every post lately is getting really mundane. In one sentence you say"I do not care if these TTM successes are secretarial/PP/whatsoever" and in the next sentence you say"The interest of this hobby is to find what autographs are probably real and others which are definitely not" Which is it? Studies have been done apparently to your chagrin and not only have studies been done but most of the celebs. in interviews regarding their signing habits have admitted to such. These studies and interviews have not been done by novices, but collectors/dealers who have been collecting for 15,20,30 even 40 years+. Beyond popular belief there are some young collectors on here who actually care that if they send to a certain person that they will receive an authentic autograph. Why waste your time and money( time writing and addressing a letter and envelope, postage, irc's, cost of the envelopes, cost of pics. or ink cartridges, etc.) to send to someone who it has been reported for many many years they don't sign thru the mail and everytime you or others write to that person it just confirms that they still are not signing thru the mail. Most if not all have already been found out if their real or not. Like I said in a previous post, young collectors are at a disadvantage because most have already been reported many years ago and for some unknown reason they don't continue to publish these reports which should be published at least bi yearly. Myself, RSVP and a few others, we don't come on here to bust B#@** We are just here to try to help out and let alot of the young collectors on here know. Quite honestly if I didn't have a HUGE passion for this hobby I definately.... Never Mind.
All the Best
Again, any advice on what should be done about this member?
Ok, and here's the latest very questionable post made by whosurdaddy:
[quote="whosurdaddy"]Hey Dredguy,
Quite honestly you ranting and raving the same nonsense before every post lately is getting really mundane. In one sentence you say"I do not care if these TTM successes are secretarial/PP/whatsoever" and in the next sentence you say"The interest of this hobby is to find what autographs are probably real and others which are definitely not" Which is it? Studies have been done apparently to your chagrin and not only have studies been done but most of the celebs. in interviews regarding their signing habits have admitted to such. These studies and interviews have not been done by novices, but collectors/dealers who have been collecting for 15,20,30 even 40 years+. Beyond popular belief there are some young collectors on here who actually care that if they send to a certain person that they will receive an authentic autograph. Why waste your time and money( time writing and addressing a letter and envelope, postage, irc's, cost of the envelopes, cost of pics. or ink cartridges, etc.) to send to someone who it has been reported for many many years they don't sign thru the mail and everytime you or others write to that person it just confirms that they still are not signing thru the mail. Most if not all have already been found out if their real or not. Like I said in a previous post, young collectors are at a disadvantage because most have already been reported many years ago and for some unknown reason they don't continue to publish these reports which should be published at least bi yearly. Myself, RSVP and a few others, we don't come on here to bust B#@** We are just here to try to help out and let alot of the young collectors on here know. Quite honestly if I didn't have a HUGE passion for this hobby I definately.... Never Mind.
All the Best[/quote]
Again, any advice on what should be done about this member?