What should be added to the celeb pages?

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: What should be added to the celeb pages?

by admin » Fri Dec 15, 2006 3:20 pm

Ok :) It will be added to the page.

Fanmail 8)

by starreyes » Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:57 am

I'm sorry, I'm pretty bad at describing things but hopefully you can get what I mean. On the list of success for each celeb (like this one: http://www.fanmail.biz/feedback/Jennifer_Lopez.html) it can be confusing to tell which success is which sometimes. Do you think we could put the username of the person who recieved it somewhere in all the info?

by admin » Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:30 am

Unfortunately it is not possible :? Actor John Doe and Author John Doe would have the same URL.

Fanmail 8)

by lutherjw » Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:21 pm

This may be too much to ask, but would it be possible for the URL to be the celebrity's name?

Example:

http://www.fanmail.biz/999.html would become: http://www.fanmail.biz/Catherine_Zeta-Jones.html

Joel 8)

by admin » Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:53 am

Lucas42 wrote:I think there should be some cases where if we know definitely you're not going to get authentic, we can put it on the page perhaps, so people know before they write?

For example all SFM, or people like Johnny Depp and Orlando Bloom who admit to not being able to send authentics, not the contentious or variable people who we're debating about. Or maybe a link to a thread debating authenticity? I'm not sure. I can see how it would be a really hard issue. But for at least SFM I thought it would be nice to explain it because some people might not understand. There could be a section saying this person *usually* sends this. If you see what I mean.
[agree]

Fanmail 8)

by admin » Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:48 am

nowandagain wrote:
admin wrote:
Maybe also a section saying this person has an autopen or sends PPs or something.
Do you think these comments should be added by the Autograph Experts and Moderators only or by all the visitors?
It's a great idea, but at times there may be some autographs that may have authenticity issues, or sometimes send PP's, other times authentics etc. Obviously, we're not all experts at identifying authentic autographs, especially since there are so many celebrities out there :(

Plus, sometimes one could be wrongly identified by another :?. I think it's better to leave it off the celeb pages, as there can be discussion in the forums instead.

However, if we do have one though, it only should be added by admin / Autograph Experts / Moderators.

nowandagain [rockon]

P.S. Plus, we don't want to see arguments break out as to the classification of some of the autographs ... especially if we're wrong.
I agree {up}

Maybe the comments could be discussed by Moderators & Autograph Experts on this board before beeing published (Ala Wikipedia)

Fanmail 8)

by nowandagain » Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:14 pm

admin wrote:
Maybe also a section saying this person has an autopen or sends PPs or something.
Do you think these comments should be added by the Autograph Experts and Moderators only or by all the visitors?
It's a great idea, but at times there may be some autographs that may have authenticity issues, or sometimes send PP's, other times authentics etc. Obviously, we're not all experts at identifying authentic autographs, especially since there are so many celebrities out there :(

Plus, sometimes one could be wrongly identified by another :?. I think it's better to leave it off the celeb pages, as there can be discussion in the forums instead.

However, if we do have one though, it only should be added by admin / Autograph Experts / Moderators.

nowandagain [rockon]

P.S. Plus, we don't want to see arguments break out as to the classification of some of the autographs ... especially if we're wrong.

by Dallas » Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:02 pm

lutherjw wrote:I think it would be best if it were only added by moderators / autograph experts / admins. :)

There are some people who may lie or may not know the authenticity of the autograph in question.

Joel 8)
COMPLETELY agree with you on that one Joel! Good thinking!

by lutherjw » Tue Oct 24, 2006 7:49 pm

I think it would be best if it were only added by moderators / autograph experts / admins. :)

There are some people who may lie or may not know the authenticity of the autograph in question.

Joel 8)

by admin » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:10 pm

Thanks Lucas {up}
Maybe also a section saying this person has an autopen or sends PPs or something.
Do you think these comments should be added by the Autograph Experts and Moderators only or by all the visitors?

Fanmail 8)

Top