Andy316

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Andy316

by nowandagain » Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:33 pm

Hi TheMailman :D

I don't think you'll be receiving a {down} from Andy, he's already replied three times after your post anyway.

His tone probably isn't so harsh in two of his other posts. It seems like he's trying to state an opinion rather than argue about authenticity. For example:
Andy316 wrote:While I see your point, the inscription has been done with a completely different pen, which suggests the inscription is secretarial. The actual autograph may not be though.
Although his opinion was unwarranted by the original poster, it's nothing to get annoyed over. It's probably not at the stage to lock the thread yet, but if it gets any more out of hand I will.

nowandagain [rockon]

Andy316

by TheMailman » Sun Mar 18, 2007 11:49 am

Sick to death of this member: http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 783#239783

The original poster did not ask for opinions on the autograph she received so what gives him the right to tell her that he thinks its secreterial? I'll probably get a {down} from him because I responsed to his post but he just annoys me considerably.

TheMailman :|

Top