FAKE SUCCESS

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!

Image Search the message board Image

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: FAKE SUCCESS

Re: FAKE SUCCESS

by BABii_ANG3L » Sun Dec 09, 2007 7:42 pm

Ok. Well, I believe you! :)

Re: FAKE SUCCESS

by elmomommyto2 » Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:48 pm

I'm 100% sure that that's what I meant when I explained why there might not be any stamps on the success in question :). It's just one possible explaination :|.

Re: FAKE SUCCESS

by BABii_ANG3L » Sun Dec 09, 2007 7:31 am

Hmm...are you sure about that? :lol:

Re: FAKE SUCCESS

by elmomommyto2 » Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:06 am

Yep Ian, that's exactly what I meant about re-using the stamps and why there weren't any posted on the scan :D.

Re: FAKE SUCCESS

by TheCollector » Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:18 am

elmomommyto2 wrote:Considering many collectors think it's ok to re-use stamps that haven't been postmarked, I think it would very easily be the explaination on this success. I don't see anything else strange about it at all :).
I am with you on this one elmomommyto2 {up} The poster might have taken the un-used stamps off the envelope before she scanned it. Alternatively it is not unknown for letters to be delivered without stamps on!!!

I have received quite a few with absolutely no stamps on. Sometimes I get charged though!!!! Sometimes not!

Also it looks like there might be something under where the photo is placed on the second pic - maybe the postage was incorrectly affixed? I have had letters with stamps stuck in the middle ;-)

Otherwise I cannot see any dodgy stuff :? Both the sigs appear to be different if you look at the last letter for instance?

Ian :mrgreen:

Re: FAKE SUCCESS

by BABii_ANG3L » Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:47 pm

Um...there were no stamps on the envelope. ;-) (SEE THECOLLECTOR EDIT BELOW)

Re: FAKE SUCCESS

by elmomommyto2 » Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:59 pm

Considering many collectors think it's ok to re-use stamps that haven't been postmarked, I think it would very easily be the explaination on this success. I don't see anything else strange about it at all :).

Re: FAKE SUCCESS

by BABii_ANG3L » Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:34 am

dgangel wrote:If you think its fake then why did you enter her into the drawing?
Well, actually, it's up to admin. If he decides it's fake, he can take it off.

Re: FAKE SUCCESS

by dgangel » Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:11 am

If you think its fake then why did you enter her into the drawing?

Re: FAKE SUCCESS

by RuleroftheWorld » Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:07 am

BABii_ANG3L wrote:If you look closely at the first one with the envelope, it looks like it was done on paint.
The only part I can see done with paint is the black rectangle on the top left of the envelope which is covering an address.

I'm assuming you're saying the autographed photo has been added on top of (what would be the original) envelope pic? If so I disagree, the photo is generating a shadow on the envelope if you look at the bottom 2 corners of the photo.

Top