Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

Re: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

by RuleroftheWorld » Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:13 pm

Thanks rpbluesman :)

Re: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

by rpbluesman » Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:42 am

Time for my chime to ring.

It;s clear that members like this need to be banned, so there shouldn't be any question on it. And if a moderator gets a death threat (serious or not) that member needs to be banned, not just put on an ignore list. If you made a death threat to someone in public, you'd be arrested, so why can't these members be banned for making the same type of thing.

And as for what Andy did in his PMs to the member, I agree with Andy on this. I didn't see anything wrong with how he handled the situation. Just because the other member was blatantly opposed to any open mindedness about following the rules, doesn't mean that Andy (or any other mod) needs to back down in a situation like this. Andy did his job 110% in my mind.

Re: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

by afem1010 » Tue Apr 01, 2008 3:45 pm

Andy316 wrote:So in hindsight, Im supposed to sugarcoat my comments towards a rude, agressive, racist member of this site, who has repeatedly said he has no intention of following the rules?

Its this ridiculous "softly softly" approach that has caused a lot of the problems on this site in the last 6 months.

No offence, but Im not wasting time being overly polite to someone like that, and Im pretty sure no one else would either.
Ditto, I agree. I wish we could just ban him flat. He is starting to become annoying.

And if that was a reply towards my post, I was agreeing with you btw LOL

Re: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

by BABii_ANG3L » Tue Apr 01, 2008 3:02 am

WTH?! This dude definitely doesn't know how to diss. Give him a ban!

Re: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

by RuleroftheWorld » Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:29 pm

So in hindsight, Im supposed to sugarcoat my comments towards a rude, agressive, racist member of this site, who has repeatedly said he has no intention of following the rules?

Its this ridiculous "softly softly" approach that has caused a lot of the problems on this site in the last 6 months.

No offence, but Im not wasting time being overly polite to someone like that, and Im pretty sure no one else would either.

Re: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

by afem1010 » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:41 pm

What amazes me is that he is a 19 year old with such stinking attitude. I love how they talk big on online forums but in real life they would duck and run.

Members with bad attitude should be banned without even the slightest hint of another root of the problem. It just shows how their negative character can affect the forum and its members.

Im am gonna stay neutral in this case, but I feel Andy did the right thing. Being polite to an already uncontrollable member would be a waste of kind words.

Cheers
afem1010

Re: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

by RuleroftheWorld » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:37 pm

I'd already had the "polite and overly sugar coated" PM conversation with him about the same subject (and others) a few days earlier, so I didnt think it was necessary to repeat myself, especially when he so obviously is just trying to stir sh*t and cause trouble :neutral:

Re: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

by cernan » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:14 pm

I think that what Admin is suggesting is that you could perhaps have been a tad bit more polite in your PM's.
Andy316 wrote:
Because its in the rules, and it adds nothing to the discussion.
Perhaps something like:
Just saying if an autograph is authentic or not really doesn't really provide any constructive feedback for the individual. If you explain how and why you came to the conclusion that it was authentic, then the person is much more likely to believe it. If you explain your reasoning it can also help others improve, etc.

---
hoop daddy wrote:
Why do I have to give a reason??? It looked authentic so I gave my opinion...it didn't have to be deleted..it was a waste of time.
---
Andy316 wrote:
Please read the rules on giving opinions in this forum. If you dont give reasoning, posts are deleted - as yours has been. Thanks.
The rules for the Is My Autograph Authentic? Forum state that reasoning/proof should be given. You are of course entitled to your opinion, however we do ask that you let others know how you came to that conclusion, thus the need for reasoning/proof. If you simply post that it's authentic, then most if not all are going to wonder why or how. If you include evidence of your reasoning then that would answer many of those questions...

*******

Has this user caused problems before? I do think that if you kindly PM them asking them to edit their post with proof/reasoning, then we could avoid a lot of this fiasco. I always think of warnings/banning, etc. as a last resort, only if PM's and other means of communication have failed. Remember that as a Moderator, you are intended to be patient with other members. Don't let their comments get to you. Even if they are screaming at you in PM's, that still does not give you the opportunity to yell at them back. As a staff member on this site, you were chosen because we believed that you were "mature" enough.

Don't be so blunt in your comments.

Re: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

by James » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:39 pm

Andy316 wrote:
admin wrote:
What's wrong with that post? Andy is simply following the rules that have been set on the forum.. and thats what we are supposed to do.. How should we respond to a situation like that one?
The problem is that Andy makes him more angry/frustrated and it create more problems ;-)

If you do not know what to do in these situation PM a Global Moderator. They know how to deal with these troublemakers :?

Fanmail 8)
How on earth did I make him more angry? I asked him to follow the rules, he blatantly refused. I didnt use foul language, I wasnt rude, I was civil and polite despite his arrogance. Can you please explain exactly how I'm in hte wrong here??
That's just what I want to know, how can Andy be in the wrong when he's following the rules set on your forum?

Re: Hoop daddy - *UPDATED March 29 - abusive PMs screenshots

by RuleroftheWorld » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:28 pm

admin wrote:
What's wrong with that post? Andy is simply following the rules that have been set on the forum.. and thats what we are supposed to do.. How should we respond to a situation like that one?
The problem is that Andy makes him more angry/frustrated and it create more problems ;-)

If you do not know what to do in these situation PM a Global Moderator. They know how to deal with these troublemakers :?

Fanmail 8)
How on earth did I make him more angry? I asked him to follow the rules, he blatantly refused. I didnt use foul language, I wasnt rude, I was civil and polite despite his arrogance. Can you please explain exactly how I'm in hte wrong here??

Top