hockeyfan1994

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!

Image Search the message board Image

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: hockeyfan1994

Re: hockeyfan1994

by celebrityfan » Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:51 pm

and again...the Sandra Bullock autograph DOES NOT match any in person. They might be secretarials.

Re: hockeyfan1994

by RuleroftheWorld » Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:01 pm

Look at "locosmeghead"£'s success. The inscription clearly says "thanks for all you are doing". Does this not suggest another "military" success?

Assuming they're legit, then HockeyFan1994 probably KNOWS the person, and in all likelihood KNOWS its a military success, so his "Go jump on them" comment is ridiculous.

To be honest, this member has been rude, agressive, and many more things beside, and other members have been banned for less.

If HockeyFan1994 hasnt been banned just because hes in the military, then thats pretty messed up.

Re: hockeyfan1994

by charmainey » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:29 am

Sorry guys, i've been in and out of the forum these past two months so i've finally had some time to check out the moderator forum.. I'm surprised not more has been done with this member, and Josephine, I thought you were really polite to hockeyfan1994 and he responded rudely.

As for the second Sandra Bullock "success", isn't LocoHeadSmog a member we've been watching?

Re: hockeyfan1994

by ldy josie x » Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:16 am

Thanks, you guys :)

You've made me feel a lot better :D

Re: hockeyfan1994

by afem1010 » Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:32 am

Neither were you rude, neither were you harsh. You did your job and did it well. Now let me give a piece of my mind to this "patriot" lover and end this stupid gloating. Frankly both successes look faked. Sandra Bullock would have stopped signing via venue because of a recent person who was stalking her and tried to assault her husband Jesse G. James.

It is time this person heard from someone. Nice work Josie. Keep doing what you do. There is nothing wrong in being frank and sincere. Frankly, living in a bunker has made him forget that others have their own jobs as well. Sorry if this sounds harsh, but being a Canadian, I respect U.S. Soldiers for what they do. I even respect British soldiers. But when they use that as a mean to undermine or degrade another individual, thats just wrong

Here is my PM to him:
Sean (as I believe you first name is)

I am contacting you in regards to your successes and the feedback you have received from individuals and moderators. Please read my whole PM message before messaging me, because I can't say things twice.

Firstly, I want to tell you of the awesome job you are doing as a soldier. I am a Canadian, and I care for soldiers of other countries as they are doing a great thing for their country. I respect soldiers and veterans and come from schools that have provided some of the fighters even for WW1 and WW2. I have a different view of war, which I shall not ponder, but you know my position towards Veterans.

However, I am sad to see that you are using your position in the army to degrade Moderators on this forum. Like yourself, they are fulfilling their duties which they have committed for. They work day in and day out to make this a great place for autograph collectors such as yourself and I, as you do to keep America a lovely place to live, and its their right to scrutinize any success on the board as you have the right to shoot a threat to the United States of America.

The many successes that you have had are successes that have not been seen on this board for a very long time, with reasons that we have gathered through research and such. Then out of the blue, we see these successes. We required information to be gathered and then put together to come to a conclusion. We requested some of that information and you just told us to "forget it" as it was "not worth your time". If you begin rudely, we shall be frank and sincere in the matter.

On a personal note, Morgan Freeman has been my all time favourite as a little boy. I have tried more times than you have, and have had no luck. Only time will tell, but it is our right to get to the point in any matter.

This PM is not an apology to you, nor will I apologize as I have no relation in this matter. However, you should be the one apologizing for being blatantly rude to the moderator who was just doing his job, nothing more. Would you ask an apology from a fellow soldier if he missed a crucial shot? and if he didn't, publicly criticize the matter to degrade him/her? I hope not, as I people integrity is your strongest characteristic along side good judgment.

I have nothing against you mate. In fact, I saw your post once saying of an army event taking place and if anyone wanted their autograph. I wanted to ask, but I was unable to send you an envelope with stamps on as I have no U.S. stamps.

I do request you, next time you do react, to read again what you are going to send, as it could be a blatant insult to that individual. Yes, you are in the army and integrity is a major thing, but you think no one else has that quality? No one was judging you my friend, just your successes to make sure people are reading and learning accurate information. Scammers have been removed from this site after careful scrutiny. It was just the process.

Do continue to enjoy the site and if you have other questions related to any addresses and such, you can contact me.

Regards,
afem1010

I have been frank and honest. I cannot see a Moderator being undermined nor can I see a stuck up man, illustrating toughness by saying he is a "soldier with patriotism". Alot of people can take a bullet for their country, you just don't see people underlying that point.

We will continue to monitor his successes. Frankly, I think Sandra Bullock would never reply with the comments she posted on those two new images in the new success.

Ive made my point

Regards,
afem1010

EDIT - Ozzman is right about ignoring him, but he needs to be told to just shut up

Re: hockeyfan1994

by ozzman » Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:18 am

I would just ignore him. Dont let him get to you. He isnt worth it. Just delete his message and move on. You did what anyone one of us would have done. Its not hard to post an envelope. He needed to be told the rules on how the forum works. Just keep doing what you are doing.

Re: hockeyfan1994

by ldy josie x » Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:43 am

Hi :)

I hate to keep beating a dead horse, but I just received this PM:
hockeyfan1994 wrote:Well have i got news for you...Have you seen the latest post about another member receiving a Sandra Bullock success?

http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 25&t=98508

Well what are you waiting for...? Pounce on him like you did me. Make sure you huddle with your other lame mod's who doubted me and write a nasty pm to him as well. I think he is faking his successes too.

I would expect a written apology from anyone worth their weight in gold. If you were a bigger person you would clearly admit fault here and apologize to me. But i can see that my first reply back you you had no affect on you. And truthfully i doubt this one will either.

I wish for the day where you need something from me. You just never know what you need until i'm your last resource and it's going to feel SOOOOO good to say "hell no!"

You were wrong to accuse me for posting legit successes. It makes me doubt the integrity of the mods that we have on this board. I defend freedom for people like you...That's what i do for a living. What do you do? It's a real shame that there's people like in this world and i'm risking my life so you can turn around and accuse me of pulling some bogus **** on here! WOW! Makes me think that maybe i'm in the wrong field!
I'm sorry, am I really a lame mod and as horrible as he describes me?
I am so offended :)

He did verbally "attack" me by sending me a few nasty PMs earlier, but I just ignored and deleted them. I guess that's what he is referring to ("But i can see that my first reply back you you had no affect on you.")

And I never directly accused him of forging his successes. In fact, all I wrote in my first PM to him was would he please post a scan of the envelope he received his successes in, and that it seems somewhat (not highly!) doubtable that he did indeed receive his "questionable" successes (I didn't put "questionable" in the message) via venue. Was that too harsh?

Ugh. Excuse me, but all I did was try to do my job as a moderator here.

Re: hockeyfan1994

by dansautos » Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:11 am

ldy josie x wrote:Because of his previously suspicious success via venue, I find these questionable:
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 25&t=96950
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 25&t=96951

What do you think?
Well his Uma success matches the other TTM Uma success that was reported a couple days ago, along with the personalization... whether it's real or secretarial is a different question. I met Uma a couple months ago and her IP sig is a lot messier than the ones being reported recently.

Reference:
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... &sk=t&sd=a
Also found another site with a TTM Uma Thurman at the same address: http://autographs.keithjakubowski.net/umathurman.htm

I personally met Mary McCormack about a week or 2 ago, and that does appear to be her signature. Plus I don't think Mary McCormack is that big enough of a star to really refuse autograph requests is she?

Here is her IP signature:
Image

Re: hockeyfan1994

by ldy josie x » Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:04 am

Because of his previously suspicious success via venue, I find these questionable:
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 25&t=96950
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 25&t=96951

What do you think?

Re: hockeyfan1994

by dansautos » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:52 pm

afem1010 wrote:What do we make of this:

http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 25&t=96491

Zip Code on Envelope: 01930

Zip Code of Venue: 01915

I have no recollection of Venues passing it on somewhere else and then to be mailed.

And how can it come from Boston if the venue is in Beverly, MA

I can understand Military is something, but hey, I don't see how these can really be successes. Now I don't know quite frankly. I still can't believe his successes as thats just plain impossible to have 4-5 celebs who NEVER sign, just send a signature.


I am lost
A quick search shows that Beverly, MA is a suburb of Boston, with the zipcodes located 14 miles apart. When it is mentioned that the film is filming in a city, it can be miles away... like when Peacock was recently filming several hours away from its production office. It's not too unreasonable to think that the item was signed and/or mailed from a different place than the production office. Another point: my home post office (in CA) is a 10 minute drive away and is in a different zipcode than my house. (And in case you're wondering about my IP being in NYC where people don't drive, I'm at school.)

Hope this is somewhat useful!

Top