Megan Fox

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

by evenstar5 » Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:22 pm

Seems to me that they also pick and choose what success actually go to the trash. I've seen plenty of successes in the VV folder that are private addresses that don't get tossed in the bin - the admin lets those stay up. Just seems a little inconsistent.

Better yet - instead of putting private address successes in the trash, why don't you go through and put the spammers there!! How many sections of this forum are getting bombarded with "watch this movie for free online" crap? Seriously. It takes up space and wastes my time because I have to scroll through the spam to get to real posts. Just a thought.

Re: Megan Fox

by Hatsawayfan1 » Sun Jun 09, 2013 5:21 pm

Admin only likes to show the success of THEIR addresses, to make them look better.

Re: Megan Fox

by dylans dad » Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:56 pm

Also email successes should count. They are mostly pretty easy to find. Not all but a lot are.

Re: Megan Fox

by dylans dad » Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:52 pm

Great idea. The Adm. could easily see in the database that after 5,6,or 7 years not one feedback that the address is probably no good. You,Hat, and a lot of others do some sometimes time consuming Work to get an address that works. Think of all the money people have WASTED using the database that the adm. knows dont work. Some work on their part would help so many on this site. All guys that find an AP get rewarded by getting thrown in trash. I dont use it anymore at all. I do have to say hatsflyaway got some successes that I had used database to no avail.So any others that agree with what us 3 have said please speak up.

Re: Megan Fox

by supertoneman » Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:05 pm

i also agree that admin does throw addresses that we tell people are private in the trash. i too just had a PA address for orel hershiser that i found on my own, and is not in the DB. they are private for a reason. if people want to get the address they should do the homework and have the pride that they did not follow the norm. admin should make a category for private address success rather than keeping on throwing the success in the trash.

Re: Megan Fox

by dylans dad » Sun Jun 09, 2013 3:49 pm

Thanks for replying back Hat. You are the one that showed me some work can get you a success when you have already WASTED money using the fanmail database without even getting an RTS. I have over 50 that I used database and get absolutely nothing back. But you find an address that does work and it goes in the trash. Adm. I think you need to take that into consideration.

Re: Megan Fox

by Hatsawayfan1 » Sun Jun 09, 2013 2:55 pm

I do agree. Admin always puts successes that are private, OR a different address other that the one in the database in TRASH. It's ridiculous.

Re: Megan Fox

by ultimatefangirl » Sun Jun 09, 2013 2:47 pm

Wow you're so lucky! Any hints on the address? ;-)

Re: Megan Fox

by dylans dad » Sun Jun 09, 2013 2:27 pm

Why is this now in trash? It was feedback a couple days ago. Just because it was a PA dont make it trash. The address in database dont work but a lot of people like Hatsflyaway and many others do a lot of work to pass on to others that there is a way to get a success with a some work. Hat if you read this dont you agree. Jackie Collins is in trash too and I got the email address from feedback on this site. Adm. sometimes you do things that I just dont understand.

Re: Megan Fox

by Hatsawayfan1 » Sun Jun 09, 2013 2:45 am

Almost... Lol!

Top